Author Topic: New Fluted 22-250 Pictures (Read 1386 times)

foycustoms · « **on:** December 30, 2004, 12:50:09 PM »

I found a place with a picture of the new fluted 22-250. Looks pretty sweet. I'll have one as soon as they're in stock. I just thought some of you might want a peek at it. If you've already seen it, well then just ignore this post. Later

http://www.galleryofguns.com/gungallery/PowerSearch/Product.asp?item_num=SB2%2DF22&index=0&max=20&start=20&instock=None&manufact_combo=Harrington+%26+Richardson&mod_ser_combo=None&category_combo=None&model=None&g_type=None&act_type=None&finish_type=None&calib_combo=22%2D250&sight_class_combo=None&price_range=None&qPromoID=&EZ=&left_handed=&youth=&item_only=0&oldsql=WHERE+manuf+like+%27%25Harrington+%26+Richardson%25%27++AND++%28Caliber+like+%2722%2D250%7C%25%27+or+Caliber+like+%27%25%7C22%2D250%27+or+Caliber+%3D+%2722%2D250%27%29+ORDER+by+manuf%2C+unk2%2C+unk3

single shot shooter · « **Reply #1 on:** December 30, 2004, 04:23:11 PM »

whats up with that stock?

Mainer · « **Reply #2 on:** December 30, 2004, 05:00:40 PM »

The stock appears to be the new H&R varmint stock made by Choate Machine & Tool: www.riflestock.com

It sure looks ugly, but given the description on the Choate website it may be functional.

Brett · « **Reply #3 on:** December 30, 2004, 05:09:22 PM »

:shock:

Nuttinbutchunks · « **Reply #4 on:** December 30, 2004, 05:20:17 PM »

I noticed there are none available :?

Fred M · « **Reply #5 on:** December 30, 2004, 05:57:38 PM »

Man alive, are these stocks ever ugly. No class.

single shot shooter · « **Reply #6 on:** December 30, 2004, 07:59:41 PM »

they are terribly ugly

Brett · « **Reply #7 on:** December 31, 2004, 05:07:22 AM »

I could live with the forend with the flat bottom and 'T' rail cut in it for mounting bi-pods, etc. , but that butt stock has to be one of the ugliest I have ever seen.

ONE HOLE 4570 · « **Reply #8 on:** December 31, 2004, 05:14:46 AM »

YUK, how about a nice cammo laminated stock with a fluted barrel that would be sharp

Rogmatt · « **Reply #9 on:** December 31, 2004, 05:29:44 AM »

I don't think I would be willing to pay extra for that stock. It is indeed ugly. They should have taken a poll or gotten some feedback on it before going out on a limb. I bet it will only last a year.

Lynn Alan Kietzman · « **Reply #10 on:** January 01, 2005, 06:27:41 AM »

Ugly!

Woodbutcher · « **Reply #11 on:** January 01, 2005, 07:39:47 AM »

Like trying to cross a Ferrari and a Model T. Hard to have it both ways, it'll work, but .......!?!! The eye of the beholder and all that.
I'll bet it's accurate, and nice to carry. Woodbutcher

MSP Ret · « **Reply #12 on:** January 01, 2005, 08:23:09 AM »

You are right guys, I was trying to be polite but that buttstock is butt ugly!!!!....<><.... :grin:

lgall · « **Reply #13 on:** January 01, 2005, 09:26:56 PM »

That is ugly. I agree a laminated stock would look much better.

MSP Ret · « **Reply #14 on:** January 02, 2005, 04:19:01 AM »

Your right guys, I think Laminated Camo would be the ticket!!!....<><.... :grin: