Hi all,
Accuracy is the commonly accepted description for a rifle that prints tight groups. Usually precision never factors into any discussion. While reading several posts on rifles that shoot tight groups (called accuracy many times in the thread), it dawned on me that i think we're using the wrong terminology.
Ok, ok, i know i am a bit anal, but here goes...
Suppose we have a target at 100 yards.
I fire a 3 shot group which hits 2" low and 2" to the right. All three bullets form a nice 0.5" grouping at that position. This is done 4 more times, all with the same results.
Another person fires a 3 shot group at a different target and all 3 bullets land in the X ring, but the group is 1.25 inches. This is done 4 more times, all with the same results.
From these two examples i would say my rifle is more precise than the other person's based on the fact that my groups were tighter.
Alternately, the other persons gun is more accurate than mine because all his bullets were in the X ring whereas all of mine were 2"low and 2" to the right. I know there are lots of variables influencing this, but overall i think it illustrates a valid point...
My point here is that we too often use the term accuracy improperly when, in fact, what we are describing is precision (group size).
I think any gun can be reasonably accurate, but not all guns can be reasonably precise.
I'd love to hear any comments on this...