Folks I am deeply concerned about the declining quality of deriding liberals and their viewpoints. The over usage of liberal, as a pejorative, has lead to a serious weakening of your rants. I am beginning to feel less insulted all the time. In the spirit of mutual antagonism, I think we might be better served by a more creative use of adjectives, increased stereotyping, and wider generalizations. If I were to refer to you as a right wing republicans, where is the negativism, you are a right wing republicans; conversely when you call me a leftist liberal, why should I feel insulted I am one, you are losing your edge. Some of you continue to refer to Kerry, and Hillary, but he is old news and since she has been in the senate she has drifted away from left some, besides their behavior is not all that sensational. So lets stick with classics like, Ted Kennedy, I mean he is always out raged at something, proven adulterer, and looking at his driving history he even drives on the left side of the road. Then there is Barney Frank, admittedly homosexual, and he even has a lisp. Now Jane Fonda is classic, how can we ever forget Hanoi Jane.
So folks let us work on it I know you can end this unfortunate slide into mediocrity. To get you started I have included two left to right examples and a reference to a conservative classic.
Conservatives, like Bush, are just gun toting, xenophobic, goose stepping, fascists, that will dance to any tune played by their Wall Street puppet masters, on the heads of the poor.
The only reason Bush went to war in Iraq, was his domestic policy approval rating were sagging.
John Ashcroft thought constitution meant going for a daily walk.
That what I am looking for broad generalizations, innuendo, unproven accusations and a multitude of adjectives, now lets start deriding the right way, as it were.
Life is no joke but funny things happen
.
jon
