So I take it your answer is no.
Now you feel 40 acres is enough, if it is dense enough and the deer density is kept down to some level.
By the way, I can prejudge rape or murder without participating in it, thank you very much. Your tendency to oversimplify is troubling.
I am not necessarily opposed to enclosures of significant size. The question always becomes "what size?"
This reasoning that we should defend any form of hunting simply because someone would call it hunting is seriously flawed.
The 80% in the middle, who neither hunt nor are oppposed to hunting, will ultimately determine our (hunters) fate. I, for one, do not wish to help the other side by supporting ethically questionable practices.
Fair chase is what it is. Check out Pope and Young if you need a refresher.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81038/810380aff619ab77e688f97a9004b7dbd5fc2cf9" alt="Cool 8)"