Okay fellas thanks for the help, after much thought and advice I bought the glock 22c nib. It came with two 15round clips for this .40 I thought that was great because I was going to buy them anyway. It's light and points good. IT is not pretty, just as I'd been warned but the compensator makes it look "neat". It's dependability and price along with a solid reputation, not to mention cheap high cap mags made this an easy choice once I was edumacated. It's got some kick to it, a bit more than a 9mm I once owned. I hit exactly where I aimed from 20 feet. This is all I wanted or needed. It's very simple to field strip and I was happy about that as it was not going to be a factor anyway.
No one said anything about the Taurus, but after reading many reviews elsewhere I didn't want one.
The Springfield xd40 fit my hand well and I liked it, I just don't think it's tried and true as a Glock but one day it just might, it resembles one enough.
The baby eagle also had a fair amount of bad reviews. So like the Taurus it was out.
The Smiths, well although I did find some good stuff about the Sw99 and sve40, I found some negative as well, but that left me at 50/50 and when I heard about the 9lb plus triggers well...
The Sig, I almost got one and I'm sure I would not have been dissappointed. But let me say they should put a better finish on a higher end gun like that. Even high points have better finishes c'mon. I would surely look past the finish though because they are highly regarded and rated. For what I was looking for I just couldn't see spending $300 more than I did for my Glock. I might not have the accuracy of one, but I'm sure it's close.
I had P series Rugers before and I believe it was a p89 9mm, it just didn't impress me with accuracy, it did look and fit very nice, built very well. They may have changed by now, don't know it's too late they let me down once.
Thanks again