Author Topic: Property Rights Versus RKBA  (Read 352 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FWiedner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
Property Rights Versus RKBA
« on: August 03, 2005, 03:33:55 AM »
Property Rights Versus RKBA

The NRA has mounted a full attack on employers who forbid their workers to bring firearms on company property. NRA EVP Wayne LaPierre announced yesterday a billboard campaign and boycott of ConocoPhillips. The oil and energy company is challenging a new Oklahoma law that gives employees the right to keep firearms in their cars at the workplace.

At issue are the competing employee right of self-protection and the property rights of employers. Business owners claim the right to make their property off-limits to firearms. But this amounts to a practical ban on their own employees' right to self-defense. Who should prevail?

We know from numerous workplace and school shootings that banning firearms from the workplace and schools has a cost that is measured in lives.

On the other hand, aside from the anti-gun rights prejudice that we know exists in the leadership of many companies, executives are doubtless trying to avoid liability arising from any injurious use of a firearm. This may change if victims of workplace or school violence start holding responsible those executives and school officials who left them defenseless in the face of a lethal threat. No company policy should deprive any person of the natural right of self-defense.

http://www.claremont.org/localliberty/archives/003543.html

.
They may talk of a "New Order" in the  world, but what they have in mind is only a revival of the oldest and worst tyranny.   No liberty, no religion, no hope.   It is an unholy alliance of power and pelf to dominate and to enslave the human race.

Offline Leverdude

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 601
Property Rights Versus RKBA
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2005, 02:08:02 PM »
Its  my opinion that the school officials & company executives are squarely responsible when a  person is assaulted in a "gun free" area. I'd go so far as to say the legislature that passes this sort of crap is responsable as well. If they pass laws preventing my protecting myself & I should be assaulted or killed because they removed my right of self defence it seems obvious they are responsible.
A more intellegent idea would be to encourage their employees to become proficient with firearms & carry them to work, be it a school or anything else.
Freedoms not free!
Support your NRA!