Trigger weight does seem to be relevant to scoring well, albeit w/ good shooters, it may not amount to many extra hits or misses. My Kimber has a good, crisp single-stage trigger, and I shoot it fairly well. But it seems like a lighter, or just 2-stage trigger (with its lighter break) would help improve offhand scores. At least in my case, squeezing the heavier trigger does result in more rifle movement (I do squeeze and try for a surprise break). It seems as though a lighter trigger would allow you to slip into a more subconscious mode of shooting, one where you are doing nothing but aiming, and the rifle seems to fire itself. When I shot target archery, I learned to shoot subconsciously by "blank bale" shooting, where one goes through the shoot sequence while standing at point blank range to the target with the eyes closed. Eventually, this leads to the mechanics of "firing" the bow becoming subconsciously programmed; one never thinks about the trigger at all, only aiming. Surely this is what the top shooters do, even if they aren't aware of it (lol; get it? "not aware?" subconscious? ah, never mind . . .). The way D. Tubb teaches to shoot offhand, by "approaching" from a certain angle, seems to dictate a light trigger. He claims to be very aggressive on the trigger, but I suspect he means that his light, 2-stage trigger allows for an aggressive "squeeze," something I don't think would work with a heavier trigger. I'm just a novice, but I'm very analytical about my hobbies, and this just seems logical to me. Any thoughts?