Author Topic: 270 hunting bullet  (Read 1065 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline billy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 407
270 hunting bullet
« on: September 18, 2005, 02:12:15 PM »
What would be a good hunting factory load for a 270 cal. ?  Need a good all around bullet.
I enjoy collecting guns, swaping and staying up on all the newest models. I deer, quail, squirrel and rabbit hunt.

Offline Ramrod

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1440
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2005, 02:40:11 PM »
Why not use the bullet weight that made the round successful? I think a fella named O'Conner swore by the 130 grain bullet.
"Jesus died for somebody's sins, but not mine." Patti Smith

Offline Slamfire

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2005, 06:00:11 PM »
If your rifle likes them it's hard to see much improvement over the Remington Core Lokts. Hornady's Innerlocks are pretty much on a par with them. The 130s will cover most uses for the .270.  :wink:
Bold talk from a one eyed fat man.

Offline poncaguy

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
  • Gender: Male
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2005, 03:48:42 AM »
Slamfire is right on....hit them in the heart-lung area, and they'll drop in their tracks........

Offline Lou270

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2005, 04:22:38 PM »
For light/medium game, I would look at the Hornady 140 BTSP load.   If larger game are on the menu, then I would look at the Fed Premium 150 Nosler Partition load.  In standard factory loads, I would look at either the 130 Corelock or 130 Win PowerPoint first.

-Lou

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2005, 10:58:07 AM »
I like the 140gr bullet for my 270 but then again the 130 is alot faster for long shots. :D

Offline RaySendero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
  • Gender: Male
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2005, 11:09:42 AM »
I really like the 150 Sierra GameKings for my 270.

But I reload.  My rifle has a lot of freebore and plenty of magazine length so I can take the longer 150s out to 3.40" OAL.  The longer length allows me to get more powder in the case w/o exceeding pressure limits.  My 150 SGKs over IMR-4350 chronos at 3,025 fps!  Sighted in at 200 yards this load is only 0.8" lower than a 270 Weatherby 150 grain factory load at 300 yards.

Really hammers deer too! - All have gone down and never even kicked.  Have never recovered a bullet either.  Now I don't shoot for the shoulder but have broken front leg bones, sternum and ribs.  Always with the same results - A 1/4" entrance and a 3/4" exit hole.
    Ray

Offline bgoldhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2005, 11:55:57 AM »
I wish Nosler made a 130gr Accubond for .270 (and a 165gr .300), but the 140's work. Also like 130gr Ballistic Tips, or Game Kings.

Offline rickt300

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2005, 07:48:46 PM »
While the 130 is a good deer bullet I have been shooting 150 grain bullets for years now. I like the 150 grain Hornady and Speer bullets on top of 58 grains of H4831 in Winchester cases. Good for deer to elk. This year I am finally going to use the 150 grain Partition on an elk but I doubt therte will be any meaningful difference. I took an antelope with a 130 grain Hornady Spire point last year and though abit destructive you couldn't ask for a quicker kill.
I have been identified as Anti-Federalist, I prefer Advocate for Anarchy.

Offline aulrich

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 678
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2005, 04:50:18 AM »
The first bullets going down my new 270 wim will be the Barnes 130 tsx (I am handloading but I think federal is loading them) my 270 is my deer gun but I wanted a backup for the 338 and with that bullet I am good to go for elk or moose.

But if you a mostly deer hunter there is nothing wrong with the standard loads, there just not a sexy as the fancy bullets.  Supposidly the 270 is prone to shooting 130 and 150s to the same POI  that would be worth checking out, because if something tougher than deer is on the menu you can jump up to the bigger head without resighting.
The second mouse gets the cheese

Offline bajabill

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 712
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2005, 05:39:59 AM »
anyone use the hornady 140 sst

Im thinking of using them in the shortmag,  I thought the extra power may as well go to a little heavier bullet instead of velocity.  They also make the 130 sst.

Offline JameyF

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
270 hunting bullet
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2005, 01:53:04 PM »
I used a 270 Hornady 130 grain SST on whitetail last year.  I shot at two deer and hit both.  The first was a small doe that was hit 6 inches or so behind the shoulder from 65 yards.  The bullet was deflected by a rib and the deer ended up gut shot.  The second deer was a small buck that I hit on the rear part of the shoulder from 175 yards.  The bullet split in two.  The top half traveled up and clipped the buck's spine while the bottom half traveled down through a lung and half it's heart.  Neither deer went anywhere but down.  

I would say they were both well placed shots with the first shot being a very unlucky bullet path and the second being very fortunate.  Of course the first deer shot had a HUGE exit wound from the guts, but the second deer had no exit wound, but I did find part of the bullet just under the skin on the opposite side.

I would say the bullet performed as intended by leaving EVERY bit of energy possible inside the deer.  Some prefer an exit wound to track a deer easier.  If you are one of these people I would look elswhere.  I don't think an exit wound is a guarantee on a large deer.  If you prefer a bullet to give maximum expansion I would look hard at the SST.  I just traded in the gun that I was shooting with the SST's.

One more point...if you are thinking of something like bear, elk, larger hogs, etc...I would suggest a bullet that would hold together better.  I would not choose the SST to go after any of those.  On a deer, however, the SST just seemed to do a fantastic job of creating a huge path of destruction, but they do deflect easily it seems.