Author Topic: WWII Battle Rifle Ballistics..from Previous post.  (Read 710 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline S.S.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2840
WWII Battle Rifle Ballistics..from Previous post.
« on: September 24, 2005, 02:18:21 PM »
Here is the actual Ballistics differences in WWII Battle rifles.

Great Britain = .303 Mk7 Ball.  37 Gr. of Cordite 174 Gr Bullet @ 2440 Fps.
France = 7.5 MAS Mle. 1929 c.Ball 45 Gr. of ? 140 Gr. Bullet @ 2600 Fps.
               Mle 1933 D. 45 Gr. of ? 190 Gr Bullet @ 2200 Fps.
Russia  = M.1930 Type D Ball. 47 Gr. of ? 182 Gr. Bullet @ 2680 Fps.
            Type LPS Ball. 48 Gr. of ? 149 Gr. Bullet @ 2850.
U.S.A. = .30 U.S. M2 Ball. 50 Gr. of ? 152 Gr Bullet @ 2740 Fps. ***
Sweden  = 6.5mm Mdl 94 Ball. 41 Gr. of ? 140 Gr. Bullet @ 2600 Fps.
Germany = 7.92mm s.S. Ball. 44 Gr. of ? 198 Gr Bullet @ 2500 Fps.
             7.92mm SmE Ball. 44 Gr of ? 178 Gr. Bullet @ 2800 Fps
Italy = 6.5mm M91 ball. 34 Gr. of ? 162 gr bullet @ 2300 Fps.
Japan = 6.5mm Type 38 Ball. 34 Gr. of ? 138 gr. Bullet @ 2500 Fps.
            The 7.7 type 92 And type 99 rounds had too
             many different loadings to list.  

This Data came from the 1975 edition of JANES infantry weapons. In My
opinion the Worlds leader in the knowledge of weapons.
Energy Tables are not provided I,ll let you folks figure that up..
Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
"A wise man does not pee against the wind".

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
WWII Battle Rifle Ballistics..from Previous
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2005, 07:22:28 AM »
First the Italian 6,5mm round is the Carcano right? I believe we have "3" 6,5mm rounds and their all different the 6,5 swede, 6.5 JAP and the 6,5 Carcano.  They don't interchange yet all three 6,5mm rounds have good accuracy it seems to be the norm with the 6,5 round.


Since we copied the 30-06 from the 7mm(7x57) round because it had awesome ballastics( accuracy) do you think our 308win/nato was copied from the French MAS 7,5x54? Since both are very close in size and the french round has been around since the 40's it makes me wonder where we got the idea for the 308win. thus 7,62mm nato?  Another round that is close to the 308/7,62 & 7,5mm is the 7,65x53 argentine round too.  Have you ever wondered which round influenced the 308/7,62?

Offline S.S.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2840
WWII Battle Rifle Ballistics..from Previous
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2005, 02:15:20 PM »
In the early 1950's (1954 I think) The US military adopted
the 7.62x51. I believe that it was simply a desire to have a
cartridge similar in power to the 30-06 but one that could be used in a shorter action.  The '06 was probably the inspiration..
Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
"A wise man does not pee against the wind".

Offline S.S.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2840
WWII Battle Rifle Ballistics..from Previous
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2005, 02:22:53 PM »
Also, there were several 6.5's
6.5x50 jap....6.5x54 mannlicher....
6.5x53.5 Daudeteau....6.5x50 rimmed
....the good ol' 6.5x55 Swede....
6.5x58 Vergueiro (Portugal)...
6.5x52 Mannlicher-Carcano....and I am sure I missed a few.
Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
"A wise man does not pee against the wind".