Author Topic: why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&W?  (Read 2455 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Reynolds

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&W?
« on: September 29, 2005, 05:56:32 AM »
I would like all opinions on why the .45-70 is a better cartridge choice for the handi.

You need to know that I'm a reloader and I also cast bullets.  :-)

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2005, 06:10:58 AM »
It's like what the 45-70 guys have been saying for so long THE BIGGER THE HOLE THE BETTER.

Offline FirstFreedom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 163
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2005, 08:00:00 AM »
Because it has about the same or a little more energy than the .500, in stout loadings, and it will penetrate better than the .500 due to better sectional density of the bullets.  It may or may not fly flatter, depending on bullet weight and sectional density/BC.  At very long range, it will fly flatter with long bullets. The ONLY thing the .500 would do better is DEFLECT off its true course of aim LESS when encountering thick bone in an game animal, if the bullet weight is heavier - simple vector physics.  This would only matter if trying to shoot VERY large, heavy game, like a Cape Buff, AND when trying to shoot through a thick bone to reach the vitals.  But I'm not even so sure there is a .500 bullet heavier than that which is available in .45-70 - the .45-70 goes up to 500 gr, no?  Oh yeah, the .500 makes a larger hole for a theoretically better chance to nick an artery or vital organ or CNS that may otherwise have been missed, but this is virtually nil actual gain, as we're only talking about 5/100ths of an inch total, and so only 25/1,000ths of an inch wider on either side of the centerline of the bullet.

In addition, I believe there are a lot more .458 bullet choices out there than .500, and the .45-70 brass is cheaper as well, isn't it?

Pretty much a no-brainer - get the .45-70! (or both)

Offline Mac11700

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (34)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6875
Re: why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&W?
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2005, 08:10:27 AM »
Quote from: Reynolds
I would like all opinions on why the .45-70 is a better cartridge choice for the handi.

You need to know that I'm a reloader and I also cast bullets.  :-)


There is a wider assortment of factory loads, bullets and loading data for the 45-70...and brass is cheaper as well.From what I've seen the 45-70's in the Handi's are real accurate...not too many results have been posted for the 500S&W as yet..so ...it's a waiting game till  we find out.

As far as being a better choice...that is entirely up to you and how you feel about the 2 cartridges and what your needs are...I haven't loaded for the 500 S&W...but from what I've seen...it looks like it will do just a good of job as the 45-70 albeit at higher pressures and most likely more recoil...afterall...it is a larger diameter bullet and if your trying to drive it as fast as some of the posted loads for the 45-70 ...it will kick more..but I don't think it's better...it's just a different cartridge...

Mac


Mac
You can cry me a river... but...build me a bridge and then get over it...

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2005, 10:35:05 AM »
If you want something that shoots flat and has a high sectional density get a 300 win mag. Of course there is a 700 grain monstrosity of a bullet for the 500. As a hand loader it kicks as hard as you want it to. Unlike 45-70 there are a lot of modern bullet designs for this cartridge. Everything from a 300 grain gold dot to that 700 grain slug. Did i mention it makes a bigger hole? Why would you want a medium bore like a 45-70?  :-D

Offline Varminter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 922
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2005, 10:50:20 AM »
Pretty much what Mac said.

From what i have heard the 500 Short&Weak is loaded to almost max as a factory offering. So that's leaves little room to improve on the cartridge IMHO. Brass is pretty pricey for it too.

The 45-70 is the original beast.  :grin:  You can load it as a pussy cat or go for some monster rounds. Brass is relatively cheap and more factory loads are available and are easier to find.

Overall it's your choice.....but i would go for the 45-70.
_____________________________________
Drew :D
n240sx97@hotmail.com

I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
The gene pool could use a little chlorine.

Offline bajabill

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 712
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2005, 11:06:01 AM »
the 45/70 has  ...  history   8)

all the other stuff is the root of endless debate leading to nothing of value

buy what you want, they are all going to kill what you hit correctly, unless you are grossly using the wrong cartridge/bullet.

Offline JPH45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1145
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2005, 12:42:07 PM »
What makes the 45-70 better is powder capacity. As to modern design bullets, the 45-70 don't need no steenkin' modern designs. It's been killing cleanly for 133 years with plain old lead, and it'll do so in the here and now just as well as way back when. The 500 is for peestols. Git a 45-70 and have yousef' a real rifle. The 500 is fer gurly men :eek:  :)  :grin:  :D
Boycott Natchez Shooters Supplies, Inc

Offline MSP Ret

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (173)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8940
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2005, 01:10:58 PM »
:agree:, much better than what I was going to say, which was, because it is!!!....<><.... :grin:

hey, if a sitting President (who should have been indicted for lying under oath to Congress, perjury to you who don't know) can get away with saying,  "It all depends what "is" is", I should be able to get away with saying, "because it is!!!"....<><.... :grin:  :grin:  :grin:
"Giving up your gun to someone else on demand is called surrender. It means that you have given up your ability to protect yourself to a power that is greater than you." - David Yeagley

Offline quickdtoo

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 43301
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2005, 01:54:19 PM »
Quote from: JPH45
What makes the 45-70 better is powder capacity. As to modern design bullets, the 45-70 don't need no steenkin' modern designs. It's been killing cleanly for 133 years with plain old lead, and it'll do so in the here and now just as well as way back when. The 500 is for peestols. Git a 45-70 and have yousef' a real rifle. The 500 is fer gurly men :eek:  :)  :grin:  :D


Quote from: MSP Ret
:agree:, much better than what I was going to say, which was, because it is!!!....<><.... :grin:

hey, if a sitting President (who should have been indicted for lying under oath to Congress, perjury to you who don't know) can get away with saying,  "It all depends what "is" is", I should be able to get away with saying, "because it is!!!"....<><.... :grin:  :grin:  :grin:


Yup!!!! :agree: :agree: :agree:  I wonder if the .500S&W will be around in another 130 years??? :)
"Always do right, this will gratify some and astonish the rest" -  Mark Twain

Offline mr.frosty

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 568
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2005, 03:35:59 PM »
I don't reload so I still use factory lead, but price wise is my opinion
for the 45/70. Simple math too 22 bucks a box of 45/70 versus 35 bucks a box for the 500.
" People should say what they mean and mean what they say. Life is too short to be lead down the wrong path."

Offline poncaguy

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2005, 04:15:52 PM »
I think the 460 S&W would be a better Handi round than the 500, shoots farther & flatter. 45-70 covers the 500 pretty well.............

Offline Cottonwood

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2780
  • Gender: Male
  • "Capturing the moment, to last a lifetime"
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2005, 05:11:01 PM »
:cb2: 45-70   :cb2:

Offline jbadams66

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
.
« Reply #13 on: September 29, 2005, 06:02:44 PM »
So I guess the .444 marlin is better then the .45-70, it has a better ballistic coefficient,  bullets are plentyful in .429 from 200-325gr? now.  The .03 difference between the bullets wont make a hill of beans difference.  It should shoot flatter since it is a smaller diameter bullet.  

Its amazing how peoples reasoning changes when some one creates a bigger cartridge with everything that made thier cartidge so much better than a smaller one.   :-D

The .444 wasnt anywhere near as good as the .45-70 to so many people on the reasoning that the .45-70 had a larger bullet (diameter and grains) Now someone has designed a cartridge that fires a bullet that is .05 bigger and according to the other post about 200 gr. heavier,  but the .45-70 is still better some how?    :wink:
Geologist know what makes the bedrock!

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
Re: .
« Reply #14 on: September 29, 2005, 06:54:22 PM »
Quote from: jbadams66
So I guess the .444 marlin is better then the .45-70, it has a better ballistic coefficient,  bullets are plentyful in .429 from 200-325gr? now.  The .03 difference between the bullets wont make a hill of beans difference.  It should shoot flatter since it is a smaller diameter bullet.  

Its amazing how peoples reasoning changes when some one creates a bigger cartridge with everything that made thier cartidge so much better than a smaller one.   :-D

The .444 wasnt anywhere near as good as the .45-70 to so many people on the reasoning that the .45-70 had a larger bullet (diameter and grains) Now someone has designed a cartridge that fires a bullet that is .05 bigger and according to the other post about 200 gr. heavier,  but the .45-70 is still better some how?    :wink:



 HA!! HA!!! Well said welcome to greybeard outdoors

Offline Mac11700

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (34)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6875
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2005, 07:30:02 PM »
Something told me this was going to stir up a hornets nest... :)

The 500 S&W is about maxed out for capacity with the fast burning pistol powders...but sooner or later there will be more loading data derived for it...no doubt about it.... with a 62 grain capacity...it will only be a matter of time for sure....... and it is a caster's dream cartridge as well,just like the 45-70,more molds are becoming available everyday...so I'm pretty sure it will be around for a while..There are loads available with bullet weight up to 700 grain cast bullets available for those brave souls if your wanting to trust unverified  reloading data..but it is a start...so for me...untill the major powder companies come out with some real rifle loads for it...in the 22" Handi..the 45-70 is still a more viable choice...dollar for dollar...it's not that one can say it's really better...that is soooo subjective to each persons wants and needs...but...it just makes more of a practicle sense...for the components and factory ammo that's all... HOWEVER ...........One thing to remember about the 500 S&W over the 45-70...going in...the 500 S&W is a 60,000 PSI SAMMI cartridge...even though Hornady's ammo is rated at 50,000 psi...they already had production ramped up and didn't change it when S&W submitted it to SAMMI at 60,000psi....Some of Corbon's ammo is at full pressure...so...from my way of thinking...since  it's a 60,000 PSI cartridge now...in a Handi......I think...provided you have adiquate recoil prevention in place...it would be do-able for a 50 Alaskan (way less pressure)...but...you are still going to have recoil up and out the wazzooo... :eek: and not be for the faint of heart or recoil intolorant..... I'm not sure I would be up for that...but...it is something to think about for the big-bore fans.....so...for now...I'll stick with my sedate 2400 FPS 300 grain Nosler Partition loads in my 45-70...I'm perfectly happy with the results and accuracy from them..:wink:

Mac
You can cry me a river... but...build me a bridge and then get over it...

Offline James B

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 944
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2005, 08:13:07 PM »
Because you can get a 45-70 and all the ammo you want.
shot placement is everything.

Offline ONE HOLE 4570

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 756
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2005, 01:46:01 AM »
Because the 45-70 is a classic. maybe in another 50 years or so the 500 S&W will be there but with the old time history of the 45-70 & the 100+ year old rifles chambered for it I think the 45-70 will always be on top due to the history of it all
Just my 2 cents  :money:
That's my boy, GOD BLESS AMERICA!!

Offline dodd3

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1004
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2005, 02:40:01 AM »
you guys remember the 50 cal i think it was called limbourgh or something like that. that cartridge was going to make all the old buff cals obsolete  but it never happened. i think this one falls into the same category.  
bernie :D
if its feral its in peril

Offline JPH45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1145
Re: .
« Reply #19 on: September 30, 2005, 04:02:05 AM »
Quote from: jbadams66
So I guess the .444 marlin is better then the .45-70, it has a better ballistic coefficient,  bullets are plentyful in .429 from 200-325gr? now.  The .03 difference between the bullets wont make a hill of beans difference.  It should shoot flatter since it is a smaller diameter bullet.  

Its amazing how peoples reasoning changes when some one creates a bigger cartridge with everything that made thier cartidge so much better than a smaller one.   :-D

The .444 wasnt anywhere near as good as the .45-70 to so many people on the reasoning that the .45-70 had a larger bullet (diameter and grains) Now someone has designed a cartridge that fires a bullet that is .05 bigger and according to the other post about 200 gr. heavier,  but the .45-70 is still better some how?    :wink:


I couldn't help but notice your age. I sure don't want this to come off as some old codger givin' the business to some young whippersnapper, but the truth is you ain't old enough to begin to realize just how great the 45-70  actually is.

It should have died like most of it's black powder breathin' brethern of the latte 1800's. It wasn't really even a great cartridge back then. The 50 Sharps was certainly more powerful as was the 50-70 Government that came first. That upstart 30 WCF, along with the slightly younger 303 Savage killed off all those famous cartridges we hear about these days, with the exception of the 45-70. Only WW2 stopped factory production of the cartridge. In a way, it could be argued that the 444 gave the 45-70 a new lease on life. Somewhere between 1963 and 1965 Marlin brought out the 444. At that point no one was chambering the 45-70, but with that intro came a whole bunch of interest in the old war horse, and the clamor was such that Marlin did a redesign on the 336 frame and chambered the 45-70 in it. The rest is you might say history, but it would be in complete. A few of us were still shooting Trapdoors. One of these was in fact my first centerfire rifle. My Dad had been given one and not being one to spend money on unnessicary things, that became the big rifle we shot. (that was 1970ish) But lots of others were doing the same too. I don't recall now who brought out the next 45-70 rifle but I do know that H&R did make a run of Trapdoors, both full length muskets and carbines. Somewhere in this time frame Ken Waters did some research on 45-70 heavy loads, nothing new really, as Elmer Keith had been loading the 45-70 with large charges of 3031 for many years, but it is likely that Waters work was the keystone of the revival of the 45-70 as a heavy loaded/heavy game rifle, By the mid eighties Browning was making a reproduction of the famous Winchester High Wall and had also done a run of the same rifle as the B78, in both cases the 45-70 was chambered in an octagonal barrel with irons sights version. I had one of the later High Wall models, a fine rifle indeed. Of course the BPCR sillywet shooting got off the ground near this point in time and revived a whole genre of black powder cartridges and rifles for them.

My little history is spotty at best, and doesn't relate all I've seen or read or experienced with the 45-70 cartridge. I'm certainly an admirer of it, I've watched as it ahs outlived some very good cartridges and watched as it has become a central force in a revival of a very fascinating part of our firearms history and heritage.

When all the smoke has cleared, there will be 5 cartridges that will outlive all the others, the 30-30, the 30-06, the 45 ACP, the 45 Colt and the 45-70. A man so equipped is prepared to kill anything on earth, prepared to defend home and country, and prepared to stand among his ancestors with the finest firearms and cartridges the world has known.

The 500 SW is a johnnie-come-lately. It is ballistically interesting, but I doubt that ballistically interesting will propel the cartridge to true greatness.
Boycott Natchez Shooters Supplies, Inc

Offline Fred M

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2362
    • Fred The Reloader and Wildcatter
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2005, 05:32:31 AM »
Well said JPH.

A couple of weeks ago I had a chance to shoot a Desert Eagle Auto handgun in .500 S&W.

We were shooting it with a pistol rest. No one registered a single hit on a man sized target at 100 yrds. While my 9mm HP made easy hits.

Though this is an impressive handgun and has a lot of recoil, giving me a sore hand after about 6 shots. Perhaps in a rifle this ammo shoots better.
With my 44S&W I could get 6" groups from a rest at 100.

In a handy the 50 would be ok for a woods rifle, my choice would be a 45-70 if I ever wanted anything that big to hunt with. The Handi 45-70 is a lot more versatile in more than one respect.
Fred M.
From Alberta Canada.

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2005, 05:38:38 AM »
What has the world came to? I never thought I'd live to see the day when 45-70 guys would start claiming the superiorty of thier cartrige because it shoots flatter and ammo a touch cheaper. I keep hearing rhe phrase maxed out from the factory....So what? Do you fellas think joe Shmo would rather go to his gunshop and pay $22 for a box of barely hotter than 44mag ammo or pay $28 for a box of the hammer of thor. Remember not everyone handloads.

 Thw main reason for all the angist from the 45-70 crowd has nothing to do with history if that were the case we would all be shooting 303 brit or trajoctory or SD or bullet avalibility it's plain ol envy. No matter how you argue the point the fact remains that if you wan't the biggest bore in a handi 45-70 is no longer it. If you use the search feature you'll find the phrase repated a hundred times "the bigger the hole the better" And now folks there is a bigger hole.

 If you don't believe me go back and read the pro 45-70 posts some of them are downright hateful :(  cmon people that is un cool

Offline ONE HOLE 4570

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 756
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2005, 06:09:51 AM »
Right now I have no interest in owning a .500S&W at this time (not saying I am not interesten in it, I am) I have plenty of big bores 45-70, 445sm, 444 marlin in handies & have dies bullets brass etc for them. This would be another caliber that I would have to gather all of the amenities that go with it & at a premium price for a 500 (also why I do not have a .204 ruger yet) Who knows what the future holds, looked at one and Yes I was impressed by the hole in the barrel (looked like my huntsman without the ramrod) In due time one will probably end up in my safe with the 204 but the 204 probably will be first maybe :roll: Life is good when you have choices
That's my boy, GOD BLESS AMERICA!!

Offline Mac11700

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (34)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6875
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2005, 08:38:54 AM »
Quote from: Krochus
What has the world came to? I never thought I'd live to see the day when 45-70 guys would start claiming the superiorty of thier cartrige because it shoots flatter and ammo a touch cheaper. I keep hearing rhe phrase maxed out from the factory....So what? Do you fellas think joe Shmo would rather go to his gunshop and pay $22 for a box of barely hotter than 44mag ammo or pay $28 for a box of the hammer of thor. Remember not everyone handloads.

 Thw main reason for all the angist from the 45-70 crowd has nothing to do with history if that were the case we would all be shooting 303 brit or trajoctory or SD or bullet avalibility it's plain ol envy. No matter how you argue the point the fact remains that if you wan't the biggest bore in a handi 45-70 is no longer it.[/u] If you use the search feature you'll find the phrase repated a hundred times "the bigger the hole the better" And now folks there is a bigger hole.

 If you don't believe me go back and read the pro 45-70 posts some of them are downright hateful :(  cmon people that is un cool



Actually...the 500 S&W isn't the largest bore available...I do believe the 10&12 gauge slug are just a weee bit larger than the 500...are they  not?

Krochus:

While the 500 S&W is a good pistol round... with the factory loads being produced today...it is not  ballisticlly equal to the full blown rifle loads that are factory made for the 45-70... you'll note that I said what is being produced today...in time...if the interest remains as high as it is...I'm sure you'll see several of the same custom offerings become available for it,but until that happens (strictly speaking buying factory made ammo)...the 45-70 will come out ballisticly superior. The old war-horse has a loyal following...and I'm one of it's fans as well...but I do see the 500 S&W becoming more...especially being chamber for rifles...and if it don't ...yoiu can always rechamber it to one that does have a proven tract record...

Mac
You can cry me a river... but...build me a bridge and then get over it...

Offline Coastwatcher

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 151
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #24 on: September 30, 2005, 10:51:44 AM »
.45/70 for case capacity.  The .500 S&W was designed as a handgun cartridge and reaches its max pressures using quick burning powders.  You need slower burning powders to reach maximum velocity out of rifle length barrels.  The .500 lacks the size to load up with the slower powders.
My prayers are always answered,  sometimes the answer is no...........

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #25 on: September 30, 2005, 12:39:17 PM »
Quote from: Mac11700
Quote from: Krochus
What has the world came to? I never thought I'd live to see the day when 45-70 guys would start claiming the superiorty of thier cartrige because it shoots flatter and ammo a touch cheaper. I keep hearing rhe phrase maxed out from the factory....So what? Do you fellas think joe Shmo would rather go to his gunshop and pay $22 for a box of barely hotter than 44mag ammo or pay $28 for a box of the hammer of thor. Remember not everyone handloads.

 Thw main reason for all the angist from the 45-70 crowd has nothing to do with history if that were the case we would all be shooting 303 brit or trajoctory or SD or bullet avalibility it's plain ol envy. No matter how you argue the point the fact remains that if you wan't the biggest bore in a handi 45-70 is no longer it.[/u] If you use the search feature you'll find the phrase repated a hundred times "the bigger the hole the better" And now folks there is a bigger hole.

 If you don't believe me go back and read the pro 45-70 posts some of them are downright hateful :(  cmon people that is un cool



Actually...the 500 S&W isn't the largest bore available...I do believe the 10&12 gauge slug are just a weee bit larger than the 500...are they  not?

Krochus:

While the 500 S&W is a good pistol round... with the factory loads being produced today...it is not  ballisticlly equal to the full blown rifle loads that are factory made for the 45-70... you'll note that I said what is being produced today...in time...if the interest remains as high as it is...I'm sure you'll see several of the same custom offerings become available for it,but until that happens (strictly speaking buying factory made ammo)...the 45-70 will come out ballisticly superior. The old war-horse has a loyal following...and I'm one of it's fans as well...but I do see the 500 S&W becoming more...especially being chamber for rifles...and if it don't ...yoiu can always rechamber it to one that does have a proven tract record...

Mac



 I don't know what you'ed rechamber a 500 handi to? The .500 bore rules out everything including all the old school rifle cartriges. Besides trust me fellas after you shoot some of the STARTING loads I've touched off You will be hesitant to bump up the preformance. I cannot imagine shooting one of the handguns.

 I'm tempted to take up bullet casting just so I can whip up some of those 700gr monsters.

Offline jerkface11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 381
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #26 on: September 30, 2005, 01:29:40 PM »
How fast will a handi rifle in 45-70 make a 400 grain bullet go? And i'm not talking about a BC a normal 45-70. My manual shows 1760fps with the malin loads in a 24 inch barrel. The 500 will get more like 1900. How's that for better?

Offline quickdtoo

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 43301
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #27 on: September 30, 2005, 01:43:30 PM »
Quote from: jerkface11
How fast will a handi rifle in 45-70 make a 400 grain bullet go? And i'm not talking about a BC a normal 45-70. My manual shows 1760fps with the malin loads in a 24 inch barrel. The 500 will get more like 1900. How's that for better?


Modern rifle 45-70 loads in the Hodgdon annual show 2108fps for the 400gr Speer JFP at 49100cup. The levergun loads are up to 2002fps at 39400cup with the same powder and bullet, all in a 24" barrel.  Take your pick!! :wink:
"Always do right, this will gratify some and astonish the rest" -  Mark Twain

Offline jerkface11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 381
  • Gender: Male
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #28 on: September 30, 2005, 01:48:08 PM »
My manuals show 1700fps for the marlin loads. You sure you aren't looking at #1 loadings?

Offline Mac11700

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (34)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6875
why is the .45-70 better than the .500 S&am
« Reply #29 on: September 30, 2005, 01:48:56 PM »
I do....it's called the 50 Alaskan.

Mac
You can cry me a river... but...build me a bridge and then get over it...