Author Topic: Wood or synthetic--Which is more accurate?  (Read 543 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bamasnyper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 113
Wood or synthetic--Which is more accurate?
« on: January 03, 2006, 10:30:52 AM »
I'm considering buying another new Handi in either 30-06, .270, or 7mm-08. I'm leaning towards the 7-08. My question is this, are the wood stocks as a whole more accurate than the synthetics, or vice versa, or does it differ from gun to gun? Also, is the accuracy of the stainless barrels any different from the blued?

Offline mitchell

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2067
  • Gender: Male
Re: Wood or synthetic--Which is more accurate?
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2006, 10:42:26 AM »
Quote from: Bamasnyper
I'm considering buying another new Handi in either 30-06, .270, or 7mm-08. I'm leaning towards the 7-08. My question is this, are the wood stocks as a whole more accurate than the synthetics, or vice versa, or does it differ from gun to gun? Also, is the accuracy of the stainless barrels any different from the blued?



Quote from: Bamasnyper
are the wood stocks as a whole more accurate than the synthetics


 in my opinion yes but i think it does differ from gun to gun


Quote from: Bamasnyper
the accuracy of the stainless barrels any different from the blued


not that i've heard , but they sure do look better.
curiosity killed the cat , but i was lead suspect for a while

Offline Fred M

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2362
    • Fred The Reloader and Wildcatter
Wood or synthetic--Which is more accurate?
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2006, 01:32:54 PM »
Bamasnyper wrote:
Quote
the accuracy of the stainless barrels any different from the blued  


Yes they are, manufacture of SS and button rifling produce more dimensional consistent bores. Speciall when they are not stress relieved before contouring like H&R is doing. There are several processes that are omited at H&R. See the movie on the sticky.

Lets just say bar stock in SS is more consistent and can be deep hole drilled with out first turning it and truing the barstock. ( they all should be)

Due to its molicular structure it absorbes less stress during button rifling and subsiquent contouring will not change the interior of the bore as much as chrome moly steel. Good barrels are all stress relieved before contouring regardless of the material. The micro shallow grooves in Handi"s are designed to produce less stress and enhances batrell dimensioal quality a bit further.

A laminated wood forearm will give you the best chance for a lasting bedding job. The post tensioned beam principle has given me super accuracy.

This principle is used on all Ruger #! rifles. Old Bill Ruger sure knew how to design an accurate single shot. Also straight wood will loose the tension not so with laminated wood. Of course this is not a new idea, only the way Mr. Ruger made it work on the #1.
Fred M.
From Alberta Canada.

Offline hellacatcher

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 976
  • Gender: Male
Wood or synthetic--Which is more accurate?
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2006, 04:10:29 PM »
I can't say about the stainless as I don't have one in a NEF. I do have in centerfire a 30-30, 22H, 45-70, in wood and a 243 laminated. The 30-30 and the hornet leave a lot to be desired the 45-70 is alright and the 243 is great. I also have a 44 mag and a 357 max in plastic while the 44 is ok the 357 mag is great. I don't know if any of this has to do with wood plastic or just plan dumb luck. I will admit I have not tried much with trying to tune up the 30-30, 45-70, or the 44. The 243 is just like I got it and had reamed out a 357 mag to a max witch made a huge difference. I also have four rem fires a 22mag laminated and 17hmr, 17 M2 and a 22lr all are plastic and all are very good out of the box.
from Tennessee---Paul

Offline mitchell

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2067
  • Gender: Male
Wood or synthetic--Which is more accurate?
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2006, 07:56:04 AM »
Quote from: Fred M


Yes they are, manufacture of SS and button rifling produce more dimensional consistent bores. Speciall when they are not stress relieved before contouring like H&R is doing. There are several processes that are omited at H&R. See the movie on the sticky.

Lets just say bar stock in SS is more consistent and can be deep hole drilled with out first turning it and truing the barstock. ( they all should be)

Due to its molicular structure it absorbes less stress during button rifling and subsiquent contouring will not change the interior of the bore as much as chrome moly steel. Good barrels are all stress relieved before contouring regardless of the material. The micro shallow grooves in Handi"s are designed to produce less stress and enhances batrell dimensioal quality a bit further.




man you old guys know so much it makes my brain hurt. thanks for the info fred , i've been wanting a 223 stainless for a while now , and now i'm wanting it even more
curiosity killed the cat , but i was lead suspect for a while

Offline hellacatcher

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 976
  • Gender: Male
Wood or synthetic--Which is more accurate?
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2006, 10:24:50 AM »
Or a 270 stainless now this is something elest to rot my brain.
from Tennessee---Paul