I'm not in the counties you mentioned. I hunt mostly in Otsego, which just went to rifles. But here's my take on the thing - I don't really object to allowing rifles, but I do object to the way it was done. I don't understand how DEC could spend so much time on deer season restructuring (public meetings, etc) and then the legislature comes along and WHAM, without any input, discussion or whatever, they allow rifles. Then, I even heard one misguided legislator say that one of the reasons they wanted to allow rifles was to thin the deer herd - which of course flies totally contrary to what DEC tried to do in 2005 by reducing DMP's! I also think they did not take a comprehensive approach within the state - In other words, if we allow rifles in certain areas (which I agree that certain areas are conducive to rifles), some areas (which are getting more populated) should go from rifle to shotgun (Orange County comes to mind)
I'll get off my soapbox now - that's just my 2 cents...........