Author Topic: 9mm please x-plain  (Read 1181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stimpylu32

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6062
  • Gender: Male
9mm please x-plain
« on: January 26, 2006, 05:57:37 AM »
My point , over 50 years ago the 38 spl. was deemed to be under powered so we come up with a 9mm which is basicly a shorter 38 spl.and every one wants one .

Now my question , what does the 9mm offer that the 38 spl. does not other than the fact that it is designed for a semi auto pistol .

This from a guy that has 4 - 9mm handguns , and a 9mm sub gun .
Deceased June 17, 2015


:D If i can,t stop it with 6 it can,t be stopped

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26944
  • Gender: Male
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2006, 07:07:30 AM »
The 9MM operates are far higher pressures and a totally different performance level as a result. It's far closer to even if inferior to the .357 than to the .38.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2006, 08:18:14 AM »
16 shots fast or 6 shots.  The ability to reload 16 more before you can open the revolver to reload.  :D
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline stimpylu32

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6062
  • Gender: Male
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2006, 09:38:43 AM »
Maybe i need to rephrase my question , the 45acp has served very well for many years then comes along the 9mm . Was this just a military choice to make ammo the same for all NATO countrys or was there more involved .

I understand the ballistics of the round but still do not understand the thinking behind the round . When the 9mm ball ammo first came on the seen it did not have anything on the 38 spl. and not even close to the 45 acp as far as stopping power .

So what i want to know is what brought the 9mm in to play ?
Deceased June 17, 2015


:D If i can,t stop it with 6 it can,t be stopped

Offline Dusty Miller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
  • Gender: Male
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2006, 09:39:47 AM »
Properly loaded either caliber will protect you from an criminal attack in an overwhelming majority of the time.  The question I always like to ask is, "Is that good enough?".  Well folks, it ain't for me and I don't want "His gun was almost good enough" inscribed on my gravestone!!
When seconds mean life or death, the police are only minutes away!

Offline PA-Joe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2006, 10:05:26 AM »
Military thing for NATO consistency. Remember in Europe until WWII the most powerful handgun round was the 32ACP. The USA brought in the 45 and it killed too many people so the Europeans wanted something with less power.

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2006, 11:32:52 AM »
I may be mistaken but I believe that 9mm Luger has been around as long as the  .38 special both were introduced in 1902. I know it's been around longer than 45AbyssmalChestPenatration  :lol:

  105gr 9mm
Muzzle Velocity: 1225 fps
Muzzle Energy: 350 ft. lbs.

 15+1 rounds


 110gr 38 special
Muzzle Velocity: 1000 fps
Muzzle Energy: 244 ft. lbs.

  6 rounds

 On the subject of 9mm vs .45 bear in mind that the whole stopping Power arguement is a complete myth, handguns are just not powerfull enough to be counted apoun to reliably stop anybody. As far as the military is concerned a handgun is something you use to hold off the enemy long enough to get to the RIFLE you should have had with you to begin with , again 15+1 vs 7+1


Offline Savage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4397
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2006, 12:03:13 PM »
The 38spl is an American cartridge that evolved from the old black powder revolver cartridges. The 9x19 was a european inovation designed from the ground up for smokeless powder and autoloading weapons. The much higher operating pressure of the 9mm round delivers greater performance than the 38spl. As Graybeard stated, it's closer to the .357 in performance. Returning troops from europe after WWll introduced the round and the pistols to this country. In the 70s the round really took off with the introduction of the high capacity "wonder nines". The standardization move among the NATO countries, and the thinking that the standard US sidearms needed modernization, led to the search for a high cap 9mm replacement. In recent years events have caused some to rethink this choice. I like the .38 snubbies, but have to say I would opt for a small 9mm auto with at least twice the firepower in the same size or smaller package.
Savage
An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last,

Offline Ocsamschainsaw

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 68
    • http://www.myspace.com/tsm002
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2006, 08:09:47 AM »
...I carry my kel tec 9mm because it conceals in swimwear and warm weather clothing, which living where I do, I often find myself walking along the beaches/boardwalks and in very hot climates.
A j-frame simply gets far too bulkyand heavy  to slide into a swimsuit pocket, otherwise I'd gladly carry one.
Having 12+1 rounds of golden saber at my disposal isn't too bad either.
WECSOG Madness-Hide Your Dremels!

Offline rockbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3367
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2006, 05:44:50 PM »
:D Pa joe, Don't forgret the Colt .45 1911, and Smith model of 1917, .45  both were used in WW I. Prior to that, there were several other large caliber guns used by the U.S. Military.

For some time we have known the 9mm did not meet our needs for a combat gun.  It was initially adapted to comply with a NATO request that all members fire the same caliber firearms to make logistics easier.  Iraq has proven we made a gross error by scraping the 1911 model of the Colt.  We have found that the 9mm does not meet the need of urban type combat.  It does not penetrate or have the stopping power of the larger caliber.  We also found the "little black gun" is not enough rifle for this type of combat.  It may have been satisfactory in Viet Nam where it was used mostly in the jungle or in a village of grass huts, but in the concret and brick world it is worthless as a combat gun.

The military is currently arming the elete forces with .40 cal and .308 weapons, I think as soon as money is available (?) we will see the total force switch weapons.  For a sidearm we bought Beretta the last time, we have experimented with Sig, and most likely it will be the new sidearm of the American forces. :wink:

Offline Simple Man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2006, 07:15:34 PM »
I have seen some "talk" of NATO looking at the the CZ 40cal as a possible standard issue.

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2006, 03:33:36 AM »
Many a nation has found itself in poor circumstances due to to many different calibers in its army. It is a logistics nightmare. The fewer calibers one has need to contend with the easier it is to supply the needed ammunition, not to mention the weaponery to fire the ammunition.
You make decisions and sometimes they are wrong decisions. So it was with the 9mm.
Blessings
TEXAS, by GOD

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2006, 04:46:28 AM »
One bullet I like with the 9MM is the 125 gr bullet at 1200 fps. I also have a 357 mag. with 158 gr bullets at over 1200 fps. I think the 9mm is fine.

Offline Simple Man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2006, 04:53:29 AM »
I too think the 9mm is a fine cartridge.

Offline rockbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3367
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2006, 07:26:11 AM »
:D CZman, Spend a week with the troops in Iraq and I am sure you will have a change of heart.  They may be great for plinking and for self defense in some circumstances, but they are not effective for stopping an enemy in a combat situation, nor have they been effective for law enforcement here in the States.

As for arming the troops with the CZ, I have heard no talk of that happening.  I have worked in an area of military logistics for the past 27 years, to date, the only test I am aware of are being conducted on several American made, including the Sig guns.

I am not knocking CZ, I own several, and firmly believe they are as tough as a marine, they just wern't on the list. :wink:

Offline Simple Man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2006, 07:37:10 AM »
Quote from: rockbilly
:D CZman, Spend a week with the troops in Iraq and I am sure you will have a change of heart.  They may be great for plinking and for self defense in some circumstances, but they are not effective for stopping an enemy in a combat situation, nor have they been effective for law enforcement here in the States.

As for arming the troops with the CZ, I have heard no talk of that happening.  I have worked in an area of military logistics for the past 27 years, to date, the only test I am aware of are being conducted on several American made, including the Sig guns.

I am not knocking CZ, I own several, and firmly believe they are as tough as a marine, they just wern't on the list. :wink:




hmmm, ok

Offline doncisler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 131
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #16 on: January 28, 2006, 06:08:33 PM »
any cartridge that has been around and popular for 100 years is a fine cartridge. you just have to figure out what to use it for.
the 9mm doesn't make much of a hunting round, not used as much anymore for target competition, but it still makes an adequate self-defense round.
even a .32 wadcutter has a place in this shooting world.
the .38spl is generally considered minimal for self-defense but it makes a nice plinker and the wadcutters can be incredibly accurate in the right handgun.
put em where you want em

nra life menber
nahc life menber

Offline rockbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3367
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2006, 06:08:54 AM »
:D I guess choice of round depends on your preferance, but many law enforcement agencys in the U.S. have scraped the 9mm because it is not an effective at stopping a man.  Most of the U.S. Government agencys have gone to the .40, Most of the State Departments of Public Safety are packing either the .40 or .357 Sig caliber arms.

Our military units are still carrying the Beretta in combat, but many of the .45s that were "moth balled" are being taken out and issued to the troops in Iraq.  The Navy Seals, some Marine units,  and Army Special Forces have purchased, and are now being armed with .40 caliber weapons. Serveral countries and several wars have proven the larger caliber is the better choice for stopping an enemy, that is the reason the .45 and .455 were the choice of alley forces during WW I and WW II. Recently, on one  of the GB fourms a letter was posted from a young Marine pointing out the need for a change in combat arms, generally, he stated the 9mm and .223 were trash for that type of combat.  That mirrows the feedback I get on almost a daily basis from the troops. Bottomline, it just doesn't make sense to show up at a gun fight with a pop gun.

As for a CCW weapon, it depends on what you want to do, do you just want to shoot and make the bad guy bleed, or do you want to STOP him in his tracks.  In my opinion, something is better than nothing, but if my life is on the line I want to STOP the threat immediately.  For that reason, I carry a minimum of .357, but prefer something larger when dress permits, but if it were all I had, I would pack a .25 rather than go naked:wink:

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2006, 06:35:08 AM »
Well maybe the 357 Sig or the 45ACP. Tried and true don't know why it has been retired. :D

Offline unspellable

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 776
9 mm vs 45
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2006, 08:54:34 AM »
The 9 mm hardball is not a good stopper.  But the sad truth is, all the apocryphal stories not withstanding, that the 45 hardball is not a good stopper either.  Bottom line is that NO hardball pistol load is ever going to be a good stopper.  The 45 will fall flat if any sort of body armor comes into the picture.  Then the 7.62x25 Tokarev will start to look good.

In civilian expanding loads The 38 Special +P would be a match for the 9 mm except that it lacks really good bullets.  If somebody comes up with the right bullet I think it would be an even match for the  9mm.

Offline Savage Tactical

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #20 on: February 06, 2006, 04:23:04 AM »
A 9mm HP should be sufficient to stop all but the largest/most doped up opponents who are not wearing body armor. Don't confuse the military's experience in Iraq with civilian/law enforcement situations. Our troops have to fire FMJ bullets (hence, non-expanding) to stay legal in accordance with the rules of war, which over penetrate resulting in very little damage. 5.56 and 9mm are excellent against people, if you can use deformable ammunition.

Offline rockbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3367
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2006, 11:46:32 AM »
:D Someone posted this before, but for those who have not read it, check out what the troops in Iraq have to say about the 9mm and .223.  Like I said in Nam, "What am I doing with a pop gun in a gun fight?"  That's when I put the M-16 down and picked an AK 47.

 
 A HOT WASH FROM A YOUNG MARINE JUST IN FROM IRAQ  
 
 
 
 Got this from a former Marine first sergeant - thought you might be interested in his sons assessment of weapons and enemy tactics in Iraq (the boy is home from his first tour, going back in early 2006, and early re-enlisted for another 4 years.)
Hello to all my fellow gunners, military buffs, veterans and interested guys.  A couple of weekends ago I got to spend time with my son Jordan, who was on his first leave since returning from Iraq.  He is well (a little thin), and already bored.  He will be returning to Iraq for a second tour in early 06 and has already re-enlisted early for 4 more years.   He loves the Marine Corps and is actually looking forward to returning to Iraq.
Jordan spent 7 months at Camp Blue Diamond in Ramadi.  Aka: Fort Apache. He saw and did a lot and the following is what he told me about weapons, equipment, tactics and other miscellaneous info which may be of interest to you.  Nothing is by any means classified.  No politics here, just a Marine with a birds eye views opinions:
1) The M-16 rifle:  Thumbs down.  Chronic jamming problems with the talcum powder-like sand over there.  The sand is everywhere.  Jordan says you feel filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower.  The M-4 carbine version is more popular because its lighter and shorter, but it has jamming problems also.  They like the ability to mount the various optical gunsights and weapons lights on the picattiny rails, but the weapon itself is not great in a desert environment.    They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round.  Poor penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso hits cant be reliably counted on to put the enemy down.
 Fun fact: Random autopsies on dead insurgents shows a high level of opiate use
2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon):   .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun.  Big thumbs down.  Universally considered a piece of s***. Chronic jamming problems, most of which require partial disassembly. (thats fun in the middle of a firefight).
3) The M9 Beretta 9mm:  Mixed bag.  Good gun, performs well in desert environment; but they all hate the 9mm cartridge.  The use of handguns for self-defense is actually fairly common.  Same old story on the 9mm: Bad guys hit multiple times and still in the fight.
4) Mossberg 12ga. Military shotgun:  Works well, used frequently for clearing houses to good effect.
5) The M240 Machine Gun:  7.62 Nato (.308) cal. belt fed machine gun, developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!). Thumbs up.  Accurate, reliable, and the 7.62 round puts em down. Originally developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being dismounted and taken into the field by infantry.  The 7.62 round chews up the structure over there.
6) The M2 .50 cal heavy machine gun:  Thumbs way, way up.  Ma deuce is still worth her considerable weight in gold.  The ultimate fight stopper, puts their d*** in the dirt every time.  The most coveted weapon in-theater.
7) The 45 pistol:  Thumbs up.  Still the best pistol round out there. Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one. With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put em down with a torso hit.  The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the HK military model and supposedly love it.  The old government model .45s are being re-issued en masse.
8) The M-14:  Thumbs up.  They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a modified version to special ops guys.  Modifications include lightweight Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights.  Very reliable in the sandy environment, and they love the 7.62 round.
9) The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle:  Thumbs way up.  Spectacular range and accuracy and hits like a freight train.  Used frequently to take out vehicle suicide bombers (we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded enemy. Definitely here to stay.
10) The M24 sniper rifle:  Thumbs up.  Mostly in .308 but some in 300 win mag.  Heavily modified Remington 700s.  Great performance.  Snipers have been used heavily to great effect.  Rumor has it that a marine sniper on his third tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcocks record for confirmed kills with OVER 100.
11) The new body armor:  Thumbs up.  Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs. and can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an AK-47 round.  The bad news:  Hot as s*** to wear, almost unbearable in the summer heat (which averages over 120 degrees).  Also, the enemy now goes for head shots whenever possible.  All the bulls*** about the old body armor making our guys vulnerable to the IEDs was a non-starter.  The IED explosions are enormous and body armor doesnt make any difference at all in most cases.
12) Night Vision and Infrared Equipment:   Thumbs way up.  Spectacular performance.  Our guys see in the dark and own the night, period.  Very little enemy action after evening prayers.  More and more enemy being whacked at night during movement by our hunter-killer teams.  Weve all seen the videos.
13) Lights:  Thumbs up.  Most of the weapon mounted and personal lights are Surefires, and the troops love em.  Invaluable for night urban operations. Jordan carried a $34 Surefire G2 on a neck lanyard and loved it.
I cant help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and ordnance are 50 or more years old!!!!!!!!!   With all our technology, its the WWII and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants!!!!   The infantry fighting is frequent, up close and brutal.  No quarter is given or shown.
Bad guy weapons:
1) Mostly AK47s.   The entire country is an arsenal.  Works better in the desert than the M16 and the 308 Russian round kills reliably.  PKM belt fed light machine guns are also common and effective.  Luckily, the enemy mostly shoots like s***.  Undisciplined spray and pray type fire.  However, they are seeing more and more precision weapons, especially sniper rifles. (Iran, again)   Fun fact:  Captured enemy have apparently marveled at the marksmanship of our guys and how hard they fight.  They are apparently told in Jihad school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be easily beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness.  Lets just say they know better now.
2) The RPG:  Probably the infantry weapon most feared by our guys. Simple, reliable and as common as dogsh**.  The enemy responded to our up-armored humvees by aiming at the windshields, often at point blank range.  Still killing a lot of our guys.
3) The IED (Improvised Explosive Device):   The biggest killer of all.  Can be anything from old Soviet anti-armor mines to jury-rigged artillery shells.  A lot found in Jordans area were in abandoned cars.  The enemy would take 2 or 3 155mm artillery shells and wire them together.  Most were detonated by cell phone, and the explosions are enormous.  Youre not safe in any vehicle, even an M1 tank. Driving is by far the most dangerous thing our guys do over there.  Lately, they are much more sophisticated shape charges (Iranian) specifically designed to penetrate armor.  Fact:  Most of the ready made IEDs are supplied by Iran, who is also providing terrorists (Hezbollah types) to train the insurgents in their use and tactics. Thats why the attacks have been so deadly lately.  Their concealment methods are ingenious, the latest being shape charges in Styrofoam containers spray painted to look like the cinderblocks that litter all Iraqi roads.  We find about 40% before they detonate, and the bomb disposal guys are unsung heroes of this war.
4) Mortars and rockets:  Very prevalent.  The soviet era 122mm rockets (with an 18km range) are becoming more prevalent.  One of Jordans NCOs lost a leg to one.  These weapons cause a lot of damage inside the wire. Jordans base was hit almost daily his entire time there by mortar and rocket fire, often at night to disrupt sleep patterns and cause fatigue (It did).  More of a psychological weapon than anything else.  The enemy mortar teams would jump out of vehicles, fire a few rounds, and then haul ass in a matter of seconds.
5) Bad guy technology:  Simple yet effective.  Most communication is by cell and satellite phones, and also by email on laptops.  They use handheld GPS units for navigation and Google Earth for overhead views of our positions.  Their weapons are good, if not fancy, and prevalent. Their explosives and bomb technology is TOP OF THE LINE.  Night vision is rare. They are very careless with their equipment and the captured GPS units and laptops are treasure troves of Intel when captured.
Who are the bad guys?:
Most of the carnage is caused by the Zarqawi Al Qaeda group.  They operate mostly in Anbar province (Fallujah and Ramadi).  These are mostly foreigners, non-Iraqi Sunni Arab Jihadists from all over the Muslim world (and Europe).  Most enter Iraq through Syria (with, of course, the knowledge and complicity of the Syrian govt.), and then travel down the rat line which is the trail of towns along the Euphrates River that weve been hitting hard for the last few months. Some are virtually untrained young Jihadists that often end up as suicide bombers or in sacrifice squads. Most, however, are hard-core terrorists from all the usual suspects (Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas etc.) These are the guys running around murdering civilians en masse and cutting heads off.  The Chechens (many of whom are Caucasian), are supposedly the most ruthless and the best fighters. (They have been fighting the Russians for years).  In the Baghdad area and south, most of the insurgents are Iranian inspired (and led) Iraqi Shiites.  The Iranian Shiia have been very adept at infiltrating the Iraqi local govt.s, the police forces and the Army.  The have had a massive spy and agitator network there since the Iran-Iraq war in the early 80s.   Most of the Saddam loyalists were killed, captured or gave up long ago.
Bad Guy Tactics:
When they are engaged on an infantry level they get their [butts] kicked every time.  Brave, but stupid.  Suicidal Banzai-type charges were very common earlier in the war and still occur.  They will literally sacrifice 8-10 man teams in suicide squads by sending them screaming and firing Aks and RPGs directly at our bases just to probe the defenses. They get mowed down like grass every time.  (see the M2 and M240 above).  Jordans base was hit like this often.  When engaged, they have a tendency to flee to the same building, probably for what they think will be a glorious last stand. Instead, we call in air and thats the end of that more often than not. These hole-ups are referred to as Alpha Whiskey Romeos (Allahs Waiting Room).  We have the laser guided ground-air thing down to a science.  The fast movers, mostly Marine F-18s, are taking an ever-increasing toll on the enemy.  When caught out in the open, the helicopter gunships and AC-130 Spectre gunships cut them to ribbons with cannon and rocket fire, especially at night. Interestingly, artillery is hardly used at all.  Fun fact:  The enemy death toll is supposedly between 45-50 thousand.  That is why were seeing less and less infantry attacks and more IED, suicide bomber s***. The new strategy is simple:  attrition.
The insurgent tactic most frustrating is their use of civilian non-combatants as cover.  They know we do all we can to avoid civilian casualties and therefore schools, hospitals and (especially) Mosques are locations where they meet, stage for attacks, cache weapons and ammo and flee to when engaged.  They have absolutely no regard whatsoever for civilian casualties.  They will terrorize locals and murder without hesitation anyone believed to be sympathetic to the Americans or the new Iraqi govt.  Kidnapping of family members (especially children) is common to influence people they are trying to influence but cant reach, such as local govt. officials, clerics, tribal leaders, etc.).
The first thing our guys are told is dont get captured.  They know that if captured they will be tortured and beheaded on the internet. Zarqawi openly offers bounties for anyone who brings him a live American serviceman. This motivates the criminal element who otherwise dont give a s*** about the war.  A lot of the beheading victims were actually kidnapped by common criminals and sold to Zarqawi.  As such, for our guys, every fight is to the death.  Surrender is not an option.
The Iraqis are a mixed bag.  Some fight well, others arent worth a s***. Most do okay with American support.  Finding leaders is hard, but they are getting better.  It is widely viewed that Zarqawis use of suicide bombers, en masse, against the civilian population was a serious tactical mistake. Many Iraqis were galvanized and the caliber of recruits in the Army and the police forces went up, along with their motivation.  It also led to an exponential increase in good intel because the Iraqis are sick of the insurgent attacks against civilians. The Kurds are solidly pro-American and fearless fighters.
According to Jordan, morale among our guys is very high.  They not only believe they are winning, but that they are winning decisively.  They are stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they almost universally view as against them.  The embedded reporters are despised and distrusted.  They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1 and then see s*** like Are we losing in Iraq on TV and the print media. For the most part, they are satisfied with their equipment, food and leadership.  Bottom line though, and they all say this, there are not enough guys there to drive the final stake through the heart of the insurgency, primarily because there arent enough troops in-theater to shut down the borders with Iran and Syria.  The Iranians and the Syrians just cant stand the thought of Iraq being an American ally (with, of course, permanent US bases there).
Thats it, hope you found it interesting, I sure did.

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #22 on: February 08, 2006, 03:50:58 AM »
I would think body armor or no body armor with the 45 ACP 3 shots fired mid body that person is going down. :D

Offline 257 roberts

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 238
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2006, 05:38:27 PM »
I was an LEO for 11yrs. I carried a S&W M10, S&WM27 and S&W659
I carry a SIG225 now as ccw
They all will work!!!

Offline rockbilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3367
9mm please x-plain
« Reply #24 on: February 12, 2006, 11:37:08 AM »
:roll: 257 Roberts.  A blackjack will also work.  The point I was attempting to make is that the 9mm and .38 class guns are not the most effective in stopping someone.  You say you were a LEO for a number of years, since your profile currently show you as being in Florida, I am sure you remember the shoot out between the FBI and two heavly armed bank robbers that occured on April 11, 1986 in the Miami area.  Two FBI agents were killed, five others seriously injuried.

The two gunmen involved in this up close and personal gun fight took numerous hits from the FBI who were armed with 9mm and .38s.  One individual took eighteen hits in the upper torso and continued to fight for another hour. One individual was so fatally shot that unless a thorasic surgeon was on the scene ready to operate immediately he could not be saved.  However, he continued to fight and moved from inside his vehicle to a point outside as he continued to pen the underarmed FBI agents down.  He eventually died an hour later when he had "bleed out" into his chest cavity.

Because of this incident, the FBI went to the 10mm and eventually 10mm short, thus the .40 caliber was born, speed of a 9mm but stopping power of the .45.  This also relates to the story of how the Army adopted the .45.  During the early 1900s, we were fighting guerrila terrorist in the Philipines.  The terrorist, mostly armed with machetes were being hit numerious times with the .38, yet they continued to advance on the Americans, killing many of them.  Once armed with the .45 it was a diffrent story, the guerrilas were stopped in their tracks

Bottom line, unless it is a circulatory or nervous system hit, you can keep on going untill loss of blood drops you.  Very seldom does a single wound kill someone, it's the loss of blood that does it.  The more people are combat trained, the more likely they are to continue to fight after being hit.  Two additional points.  the psychological shock from a gunshot wound, may incapacitate the individual, while pain often incapacitates when the injury is actually very minor.

I served two tours in Viet Nam and was witness to numerous people being shot.  You never knew how someone would react, those you thought were Rambo, and would continue to fight, would sometime quit fighting when hit.  Then the guy you pegged as a wimp would do things after he was hit that you never expected from him.

When I weigh all the factors, if I have to shoot someone, I want them DEAD.  There are a number of reasons for this train of thought, first, self (or family) protection, second, a dead man can not testify against me in a court of law, third, thanks to out bleeding heart courts, the libility for damages to an individual as a result of a gunshot wound are much higher for an injuried person than for a dead one.  

I may pack something smaller when dress or conditions make it necessary, but my CCW of choice is still at least a .40. :wink: