Author Topic: 26 or 36? (Read 1344 times)

The Pistoleer · « **on:** February 11, 2006, 07:35:56 AM »

I am about to buy my first Glock. I have been a 19 11 man for over 40 years but after shooting my CCW instructor's 26 I was pretty impressed and the size is a real plus for CCW carry.

26 pros:
Ammunition cheaper and more available.
More accessories.
Less recoil (although I have a AMT 45 Backup that the recoil isn't that bad on)
More ammunition capacity
Cons:
Little bulkier and harder to conceal
Ammunition isn't as powerful

36 Pros:
Slimmer, easier to conceal
Ammunition is a better stopper
Cons:
More recoil
less options as far as holsters and magazine pouches. I have found very few holsters listed for the 36 in various catalogs.
Ammunition more expensive.

What do you think?

Pete

Ahab · « **Reply #1 on:** February 12, 2006, 05:53:48 AM »

:grin: I went with 36. Recoil is no problem. Uncle Mike has a clip holster that fits inside the pants or pocket. White box ammo can be found on sale around here for $10-12 a box. Nice carry piece.

Flinch · « **Reply #2 on:** February 16, 2006, 07:03:59 AM »

I also have a 36, so far its been a great little gun. The recoil isnt any worse than a commander size 1911, and for me it conceals better then anything else I have.
The # of rounds it holds could be an issue, but thats the price you pay for a very concealable 45. I carry 7 in the gun and 2 spare mags. For me that should be plenty.
As for holsters and accessories, I have found that a lot of stuff that fits a G19 will also fit the 36 like a glove, specially if its made of leather, but fit test it first if you can. Hope this helps.

Bubba w/a 45/70 · « **Reply #3 on:** February 23, 2006, 03:29:59 PM »

Most holsters that aren't kydex, which are made for the 19, should fit the 36 close enough.

If you're into modifying your guns, and you get a 36, you can round off the triggerguard and then it should fit pretty much most of the 1911 holsters (leather) out there.

Bubba w/a 45/70 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 23, 2006, 03:33:34 PM »

BTW, if forgot to say that I really like my 36. It shoots "softer" than my full sized 1991A1, and the round count isn't that much of a deal. If one considers the compact 1911's out there, it isn't any different in the capacity.

Cottonwood · « **Reply #5 on:** February 23, 2006, 05:59:08 PM »

I carry a G-19 and have also owned the G-27 (same size as the G-26) I wouldn't feel under-gunned with the G-26 one bit, BUT having a choice between a 45 ACP or the 9mm makes a guy really ponder.... and ponder some more.

I'm in the market for a .45 ACP and the G-36 fits that bill in a very nice package. And with the following pic you can see the G-36 delivers great groups. Here is also a great artical (picture stolen from this link Shooting Times

Savage · « **Reply #6 on:** February 24, 2006, 01:50:11 AM »

Montanan,
Having owned both the 19 and the 36, to me they are about the perfect size for a concealed belt gun. I let my 19 get away from me, but someday I'll own another one. Meanwhile, my holsters for the 19 fit the 36 like a glove. If you decide on the 36, it's just a bonus as you already have the leather/kydex for the 19! Love my 36!!
Savage

Cottonwood · « **Reply #7 on:** February 24, 2006, 05:38:09 AM »

Savage

I'm looking forward to getting the G-36 and hopefully very soon.... it's not that I need it, as much as want it.

There is only one other handgun company that makes what I might be interested in because of the thinness of what they make... their quality is bar none as well. But we won't discuss that brand here.

Savage · « **Reply #8 on:** February 24, 2006, 08:51:13 AM »

Montanan,
As much as I like the 36, the thinnest of the .45 carry guns, and my favorite is the Kimber Ultra Carry! It's ok to like Glocks and 1911s!!
Savage

Old Griz · « **Reply #9 on:** March 26, 2006, 03:34:43 AM »

:cb2: Given your two options, I think the 36 is the clear winner. I don't have one yet, but my next automatic will be the 36. Love that .45 ACP!