Author Topic: BIGFOOT PHOTO UPDATE!!!! (Read 6124 times)

NONYA · « **Reply #60 on:** March 24, 2006, 10:31:00 PM »

Right now the bidding on my BF corpse has exceeded 450 Billion,Micheal Jackson is the top bidder right now...as for my photos I have jst signed a 600 billion dllar book deal,its going to be a short book,3 pages,but well worth the 119.99$ shelf price it will have. :grin:

Swamp Fox · « **Reply #61 on:** March 24, 2006, 11:19:35 PM »

It's becomming clear to me.

Jackson is part of the BF coverup and is making evidence dissapear. :roll:

JPSaxMan · « **Reply #62 on:** March 25, 2006, 04:09:20 AM »

NO NO NO NO NO

IT'S ALL WRONG, THIS AIN'T BIGFOOT!

It's one of NONYA's relatives

NONYA · « **Reply #63 on:** March 25, 2006, 04:45:15 AM »

Maybe I AM A BIGFOOT!! :eek:

Graybeard · « **Reply #64 on:** March 25, 2006, 06:36:51 AM »

Sorry, glanceblamm but no cigar. I was at BM's house and he pointed out to me the spot on the photo where he saw the baby and that ain't it. Good try tho but your baby is about 100 times the size of what BM showed me. Recall he says you need a 2X magnifier to see it.

Glanceblamm · « **Reply #65 on:** March 25, 2006, 10:56:35 AM »

Quote

Fuzzy photos are like Rorschach tests. You can see anyhing you want and the longer you look the more detail becomes apparent

Perhaps I passed, or failed this test depending on what is correct.

The arm is ok but really runs more to the right side.
The child is up a little higher than what is shown.

What I did was to try to enhance the already enhanced photo then spray paint the thing with the mouse. It was kinda like when I am out to the garage and try to nail a couple boards together. :-D
I was hoping that my detail would be at least shotgun accurate.

Ray Ford · « **Reply #66 on:** March 25, 2006, 11:15:02 AM »

Quote from: wolfsong

Hello guys, I'm a newbie here, and being from the city, I have just one question for you. What's a Bigfoot? Or Sezqwatch or skunkmonkey or stink chimp or something like that, that I'm reading so much about? Is this for real or are you guys just having some fun or what? Where can I go to see one, if you guys are for real? Is there a spa/dude ranch, say, in Arkansas or somewhere that has these Bigfeet? Sounds like a great thing to do with the family for vacation this year. Also, do you think it would be o.k. to take my mother-in-law and our pet poodle to see one of these things? And about that photograph in this post - is that the toe of a Bigfoot? Maybe use a panoramic camera next time so you can get more of it in the picture. Anyway, thanks. I can see that I'll learn alot from the folks at this forum. Take care. Homer Simpson.

Bigfoot is the best excuse since men's prayer meeting to get out of the house and with the guys in the evenings.
Preacher

Ray Ford · « **Reply #67 on:** March 25, 2006, 11:25:15 AM »

Quote from: TH

Why is the sky in the upper left corner of the photo all screwed up. The sky in the upper right is perfectly clear and you can make out the tree tops easily, but in the upper left it is all messed up. This looks like what i used to get for pictures when my 35mm was running out of film, like when you get 27 exposures out of a 24 exposure roll that last few are always messed up or half developed with all kinds of odd artifacts in them.
Wish I lived close to BM so I could look at it in person, don't believe in bigfoot but am always willing to be proved wrong.
TH

The "sky" in the upper left of BM's picture is not sky: it is creek bank. The camera was affixed to a tree with a bungee--did I even come close on that spelling--cord. Apparently something skewed the camera so that it caught the bank on the left and the sky on the right with the image separating the two. I recall there being some discussion at BM's place about doing some on-site investigation to determine exactly how the camera was positioned, but I don't think that was ever done. I saw both the photo and the camera site.
Preacher

JPSaxMan · « **Reply #68 on:** March 25, 2006, 04:53:11 PM »

How was the camera operated if it was hanging from a bungee cord? :?

Graybeard · « **Reply #69 on:** March 25, 2006, 05:51:49 PM »

Quote

How was the camera operated if it was hanging from a bungee cord?

The camera was a trail cam aka deer cam. They don't need human intervention to operate, you just affix them to a tree and walk away and they do the job on their own.

JPSaxMan · « **Reply #70 on:** March 25, 2006, 05:53:11 PM »

I did not know he was using a trail cam. Thanks, knew that

But I don't believe the bugee cord theory; I see sky in the top of the pic, which would lead me to believe the camera was upright, but I could be wrong about that too :?

D.G. · « **Reply #71 on:** March 25, 2006, 06:27:02 PM »

Gentlemen,
Since I was the one to cast certain doubts on the picture(s) in question, let me remind you that the doubt I cast was on the statement that these pics were better than the stills from the Patterson film and fall under the category as Blobsquatch. Thisa was before all the other related B.S. I believe that I have since been proven correct just by the fact that so many people have run the copy thru various computer programs designed to draw something out of the pic.
Remember, the only thing I said was false was the statement about being better than the Patterson pics.
Again if you have to try and enhance any of these pics by any means in order to make then more "viewer friendly" THEY ARE NOT BETTER THAN THE PATTERSON PICS.
M.K. Davis did some great work with the Patterson film to determine if this could be a fake or not. So his credentials are there. Let me point out again that the Patterson film was pretty well cut and dried as to what it was, namely a large bipedal creature crossing a creek bed, nobody could deny what it was claimed to be, because that is just what it appeared to be, even to the uneducated naked eye.
My point was made a long time ago.
That point being that the statement that this pic or any others in BM's possession are better than the Pattereson film was a FALSE statement.
That fact nobody can argue, case closed.
Nothing to see here move on.

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #72 on:** March 25, 2006, 09:44:19 PM »

Quote from: beckjord

Quote from: D.G.
Gentlemen,
Since I was the one to cast certain doubts on the picture(s) in question, let me remind you that the doubt I cast was on the statement that these pics were better than the stills from the Patterson film and fall under the category as Blobsquatch. Thisa was before all the other related B.S. I believe that I have since been proven correct just by the fact that so many people have run the copy thru various computer programs designed to draw something out of the pic.
Remember, the only thing I said was false was the statement about being better than the Patterson pics.
Again if you have to try and enhance any of these pics by any means in order to make then more "viewer friendly" THEY ARE NOT BETTER THAN THE PATTERSON PICS.
M.K. Davis did some great work with the Patterson film to determine if this could be a fake or not. So his credentials are there. Let me point out again that the Patterson film was pretty well cut and dried as to what it was, namely a large bipedal creature crossing a creek bed, nobody could deny what it was claimed to be, because that is just what it appeared to be, even to the uneducated naked eye.
My point was made a long time ago.
That point being that the statement that this pic or any others in BM's possession are better than the Pattereson film was a FALSE statement.
That fact nobody can argue, case closed.
Nothing to see here move on.

reply:

Marlon Davis has no credentials.

I have perused your website. One of the things you maintain is that apparently no one w/o formal education credentials should be taken seriously. What "credentials" did Mr. Patterson or Mr. Gimlin have?

NONYA · « **Reply #73 on:** March 25, 2006, 11:00:37 PM »

I am the only one here that knows that patterson admitted it was a fake before he died...HELLO! :eek:

Graybeard · « **Reply #74 on:** March 26, 2006, 07:22:29 AM »

Quote

I am the only one here that knows that patterson admitted it was a fake before he died...HELLO! :eek:

Nonya, is this another attempt at humor or do you have something to add here that some/most/all of us aren't aware of?

Now mind you I am one of those skeptics who believe the film was a hoax whereas most of the mainstream bigfoot believers seem convinced it is not and is the real McCoy.

D.G. · « **Reply #75 on:** March 26, 2006, 10:13:54 AM »

Nonya, it was Ray Wallace that made the so-called dying confession about faking the tracks , not Roger Pattereson.

BTW, Graybeard, I'm sorry to read on the BFF site about your bad eyesight.

NONYA · « **Reply #76 on:** March 26, 2006, 12:25:12 PM »

I watched a docu on discovery channel where the family of one of the makers of the film revealed it was a fake and he wanted it done after he died,they also interviewed the man who wore the costume and he re-enacted the walk and how the film was made and why.

Graybeard · « **Reply #77 on:** March 26, 2006, 01:09:02 PM »

Quote

BTW, Graybeard, I'm sorry to read on the BFF site about your bad eyesight.

Yup I read that too, reckon I best go get me some glasses.

Last time my vision was checked it was 20/30, not perfect but not bad, didn't need glasses then. But now it is true I have a serious problem seeing anything up close so do have to use reading glasses up close. That is I think what he was referring to. But I did use reading glasses to view the photo and with them I was able to see quite well what was/wasn't there and I just don't see anything there even if he does.

Nonya I think I saw that same thing. I guess to me that's no more proof it's not true than the film is proof it is true. I remain unconvinced after seeing both the film and the show you mentioned which didn't alter my perception of the original film. To me it looks laked based solely on all the shows I've seen where it and bits of it were shown.

Fishbone35 · « **Reply #78 on:** March 26, 2006, 01:11:19 PM »

Quote from: NONYA

I watched a docu on discovery channel where the family of one of the makers of the film revealed it was a fake and he wanted it done after he died,they also interviewed the man who wore the costume and he re-enacted the walk and how the film was made and why.

The first person you're referring to sounds like Ray Wallace. His claim was faking bigfoot tracks. The second person was Bob Heironimous, who claimed to have worn a suit. However, Bob can't get his story straight as to whether he wore a home-made horse hide suit or a commercially made gorilla suit. And that's just one of the holes in his story you could drive a bus through.

C'mon man, if you're going to try and ridicule people you need to at least educate yourself a bit more concerning the issues.

NONYA · « **Reply #79 on:** March 26, 2006, 08:42:39 PM »

Fishy i dont need any help ridiculing people who preach alternative planes,worm holes,shapeshifting beings,mind control,and stink chimps,that stuff writes itself!As far as bigfoot is concerned i dont think anyone has a degree in it,since it is a MYTHICAL being that has never been studied by science,Im pretty sure a degree in BF requires someone to spend WAY to much time in a tree stand with a jug and a slight case of hypothermia. :wink:

countryrebel8174 · « **Reply #80 on:** March 26, 2006, 10:30:15 PM »

one time i was out picking morel mushrooms over in eastern oregon and i walked down to a stream to get a drink of water and i swear i seen a bigfoot...thats right a bigfoot...he was like 16 feet tall(well maybe not that tall maybe like 8 or 9 feet)! he was picking wild onions out of the ground and sticking them in his pouch(it was alot like a kangaroo pouch, only it was on his back kinda like a fanny pack). i ducked down instinctivly and readied my hand gun. i had never seen a bigfoot before and was terrified.
it was only after i had relieved myself in my pants out of shear and utter terror, that i noticed he was sniffing the air much like a dog would. then he started walking towards me. i hid behind a fallen log waiting for the monster to show his face. i must have waited for a good 15 minutes before i looked up again. he was gone. so i went back to the truck and changed my shorts and got my rifle figuring i could sell the giant monkey to someone for a hefty price and had no intention of hunting big foot with a hand gun. i headed back to the place wear i had seen him and started following the massive foot prints. i walked for a good 4 and a half hours before i was able to catch a glimpse of the creature. but he dissapeared before i could get a shot. determined now i started walking faster but night caught up with me sooner then i would have liked. i spent the night in a tree and i damn near caught hypothermia. when i woke up the next morning i was sore...really sore....i dont know how many of you have slept in a tree but its not comfortable. anyways after awhile i found the trail he had took and followed it all the way to the big foots camp. it looked alot like an ewok village( you know those furry little dudes from star wars). there were big foots( or big feet which ever one makes it plural) everywhere. i watched them for 2 days before i decided to go in for a kill. i saw a big foot walking away from camp and decided to follow it.
when we were about a quater mile from camp i shot it in the neck killing it dead as a doornail. after i had gutted it and had started to quarter it up i felt something grab me on the shoulder and spin me around like a top. then i felt a thunk on my head and everything went black. when i awoke i found myself in a cage with a rabbit , a couple squirrels and a bunch of wild onions, carrots and herbs. in front of me was a bigfoot sitting by a fire roasting a large unicorn on a spit. i knew i was going crazy at this point because everyone knows that unicorns dont exist. after awhile of sitting in the cage and watching a herd of bigfoots(bigfeet) devouring the unicorn, i just knew i was going to be dinner. then they all quit eating and moved out of the way for a huge bigfoot whose face was painted with berries. the giant ape walked up to the cage and started to open it i started screaming like a little girl thats when it happened....it started talking....in english no less. it said STOP SCREAMING we arent going to eat you! you are our guest seeing as how you killed bob. i was like wha huh...whose bob i dint kill bob. then it pointed at the bigfoot i had shot earlier...."thats bob" it said. then he explained how bob had killed a sacred unicorn out of season and how my shooting him meant that i was going to take his place as a welcomed member of the tribe. i was like um, but how am i going to explain this to my wife. the big foot pointed to a burly looking ape with a beard and said well shes right there youd better explain it just like it is. well ive never cheated on my wife and i sure wasnt going to start with something that had a beard. so i made a proposition with the head big foot. if i can go home and just talk to my human wife ill come back and fulfill my duty as a part of your community. he said deal. i asked him for one thing before i left, and that was to take a picture . he said what the heck cause nobody would believe me anyway.
so i took the picture and went home and never went back. and to make matters worse my picture ended up getting water spilled on it and ya cant make a thing out in it.....yall believe me dont ya?

country rebel

NONYA · « **Reply #81 on:** March 26, 2006, 10:54:12 PM »

Ill buy the unicorn part. :wink:

Fishbone35 · « **Reply #82 on:** March 27, 2006, 12:57:36 PM »

Quote from: NONYA

Fishy i dont need any help ridiculing people who preach alternative planes,worm holes,shapeshifting beings,mind control,and stink chimps,that stuff writes itself!

Well, that excludes me then because I don't subscribe to any of the things you've mentioned.

Quote

As far as bigfoot is concerned i dont think anyone has a degree in it,since it is a MYTHICAL being

Mythical in your opinion. (C'mon, get with the program. You've got to learn to validate your statements.)

Quote

that has never been studied by science,

There are several scientists who are currently studying this phenomenon, so you're wrong on that count.

Quote

Im pretty sure a degree in BF requires someone to spend WAY to much time in a tree stand with a jug and a slight case of hypothermia. :wink:

Too funny! :roll:

jpred1 · « **Reply #83 on:** March 27, 2006, 02:51:14 PM »

NONYA------I know bigfoot exist.I wake up beside her every morning and she cooks breakfast and gets the kids off to school.We even have one baby bigfoot.1 outa 3 aint bad.She still speaks english I believe ,see she sits on left end of couch and Im patitially deaf in leaf ,so it does sound like gibberish often.

NONYA · « **Reply #84 on:** March 28, 2006, 12:01:05 AM »

lol jPRED,do we get some pics of the littlefoot?Fishy,hate to burst ur bubble but the skeptic or non-believer does not have to validate ANYTHING,its the believer or "EXPERT" that has somthing to prove.The complete lack of physical evidence after 2 hundred years of living here among the stink chimps validates my opinion,and completly invalidates yours,get to work,get that stinky chimp out of that worm hole and Ill take a look. :wink:

Fishbone35 · « **Reply #85 on:** March 28, 2006, 01:35:23 AM »

I was referring to validating your statement as being an opinion. :wink:

As for no physical evidence, I think thousands of footprints that fall outside human parameters, and which have been being found for over a couple of hundred years in places that are so far out of the way that anyone hoaxing them would be wasting their time for the most part, is at least compelling. Would you not agree with that?

NONYA · « **Reply #86 on:** March 28, 2006, 01:41:01 AM »

A plaster cast of a impresion on the ground is NOT physical evidence,by any means,physical evidence is a skull,a body,a single piece of one of these stink chimps has never been produced,plenty of hair samples that have all been proved NOT to be that of a new species but nothing to prove the existance of a new species of primate.I can make a footprint in the ground and fillit with plaster any day,it PROVES nothing,and if thats all you guys have to go on I hae some ocean front property up here in MT i want to sell ya. :roll:

victorcharlie · « **Reply #87 on:** March 28, 2006, 01:56:41 AM »

Quote from: countryrebel8174

one time i was out picking morel mushrooms over in eastern oregon . ..yall believe me dont ya?
country rebel

You sure them mushrooms were Morels?

Fishbone35 · « **Reply #88 on:** March 28, 2006, 02:18:27 AM »

Quote from: NONYA

A plaster cast of a impresion on the ground is NOT physical evidence,by any means,physical evidence is a skull,a body,a single piece of one of these stink chimps has never been produced,plenty of hair samples that have all been proved NOT to be that of a new species but nothing to prove the existance of a new species of primate.I can make a footprint in the ground and fillit with plaster any day,it PROVES nothing,and if thats all you guys have to go on I hae some ocean front property up here in MT i want to sell ya. :roll:

Funny, I don't recall saying anything about plaster casts. I was referring to the trackways and prints themselves.

You've obviously never bothered to try and learn more about this subject. You seem to be content to simply ridicule those who have. To each his own I guess. As for me, I'm not here to try and convince anyone (least of all a blatherer), I'm simply passing along what I've learned. Consider it, or disregard it, no skin off my nose either way.

NONYA · « **Reply #89 on:** March 28, 2006, 03:05:05 AM »

Tracks in the ground in any form do not qualify as physical evidence,you are obviously having a hard time grasping the term,physical evidence is an object,a tiny piece of bone would be consistent with the term,a single hair,a derpresion in the ground that is in one persons opinion a BF track does not qualify.Do all of humanity a favor and dont pass on your "knowledge" to future generations.Maybe the evidence you seek is on one of those other planes where the shapeshifters dwell,if you could only locate thier worm holes that are hidden deep in the forest you could get some of thier 49 chromosone dna and prove me wrong.LOL Victor i was thinking the same thing at the beggining of his story but if thats true then these stink chimps must be shroom addicts,they even have shroom pouches to carry thier stash in!