Author Topic: BM's high definition image now posted at..... (Read 1373 times)

Graybeard · « **on:** April 05, 2006, 06:05:43 AM »

www.squatchdetective.com but you much be a member there to view it. Since the site owner requested members not link to it or copy it to other sites I will honor his request. If you wish to see it for now you must go there.

Honestly I can see no noticeable improvement in it over the lower definition copy that has been floating around for some time now. But then I don't think that will come as a shock to anyone who has seen the actual photo in his book.

FOsteology · « **Reply #1 on:** April 05, 2006, 08:09:35 AM »

Indeed.... I see nothing new. Honestly BM, not ragging on you....but I can not for the life of me understand how you can see what you claim in this photo.

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #2 on:** April 05, 2006, 08:35:35 AM »

I looked at it this AM and it's just as I thought...an "enhanced" blobsquatch no better than the original photo that D.G., Todd, Dr. Wallace and I (plus later on, G.B., himself) looked at in BM's house that evening.

However, there are a couple of posters (over there) doing a first rate job of pimping it.

D.G. · « **Reply #3 on:** April 05, 2006, 09:31:03 AM »

Wait....... Wait.......I think .........I think I can.........
No just gas, looks the same to me, BLOBSQUATCH.

Is it better than the Patterson Film?

Can this issue just die?

Another Blobsquatch.

Sasquatch · « **Reply #4 on:** April 05, 2006, 09:35:12 AM »

Man oh man..did he waste alot of money getting that thing copyrighted. :shock:

Graybeard · « **Reply #5 on:** April 05, 2006, 11:03:25 AM »

I don't wish to doubt his veracity BUT..... do you REALLY believe a lawyer in OK is now nearly $800 richer over that image? If so, he should be disbarred for charging that much to do something Doug could have done himself for free.

bullet maker · « **Reply #6 on:** April 05, 2006, 01:08:56 PM »

Quote from: Graybeard

I don't wish to doubt his veracity BUT..... do you REALLY believe a lawyer in AR is now nearly $800 richer over that image? If so, he should be disbarred for charging that much to do something Doug could have done himself for free.

Hey guys and Graybeard

To show how rumors are started, this is the reason you shouln`t listen to other people that dont know the facts.
1. The money went to a lawyer in Tulsa, Okla,---not Arkansas.
2. I learned more than you guys will ever know. I wont go into the detail, but alot of you guy`s are mistaken on the work (Copyrite). Even you NONYA,

and yes it is true that you can copyrite your own material, but the monitary, gain is 100% if done right, and 0 if done wrong. I am not making or pointing any fingers, cause I know you all meant will, but I did it my way, and it was better.
3. No, I`m not loaded with money, I had to buy truck tags, 5th wheel tags, and lawyer bill, came to about $3,000.00. thats all paid up front. So I had a very expensive week.
4. All of you were wrong about slander and Libel. I`m not going to tell you, it would take up to much space, and after all I paid to get the truth.
5. The pictures over at satquatchdective.-- Even Steve said he was still working on the picture. Its not even close to being over with.
6. I had the pictures enhanced today and I`m in the process of sending them to Steve, I had them lighted up more, and boy the detail, is their.

7. You all have a nice day..

bullet maker

WmRoy · « **Reply #7 on:** April 05, 2006, 01:27:29 PM »

So why not post the photo over here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry I don't need to see it that badly!

:x

bullet maker · « **Reply #8 on:** April 05, 2006, 03:50:29 PM »

Because with all the c*^p that has gone on and been allowed to go on this site doesn't deserve it. :noway:

WmRoy · « **Reply #9 on:** April 05, 2006, 04:34:15 PM »

Seems to me you'd want to prove you were right......... if in fact you were....

Graybeard · « **Reply #10 on:** April 05, 2006, 04:52:18 PM »

Quote

6. I had the pictures enhanced today and I`m in the process of sending them to Steve, I had them lighted up more, and boy the detail, is their.

No Doug I'm sorry but it is NOT. I copied the image to my hard drive and I too have all the fancy stuff to play with the image and used it today. There is NOTHING there to enhance and there is nothing there when you lighten or darken it or add a multitude of colors. There is zero detail in that image. I've manipulated it 9 ways from Sunday and there is just nothing there.

Guys if there was anything there to back up the hype he would be posting it to prove himself right. It's just not there to prove. I won't post it tho as I will honor his wishes and the request of the site owner who has asked that members of that site not post it elsewhere even tho it would be easy to do so.

Graybeard · « **Reply #11 on:** April 05, 2006, 06:12:58 PM »

Quote

Because with all the c*^p that has gone on and been allowed to go on this site doesn't deserve it. :noway:

I think you are correct Doug, we really don't "deserve" them. Good decision. :roll:

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #12 on:** April 05, 2006, 06:27:29 PM »

It's so bad that (apparently) even Kull has pulled the "enhanced" pic from "his" site.

I believe it was D.G. who mentioned something about a trainwreck?

Whaddya expect from a retired RR guy! :roll:

Graybeard · « **Reply #13 on:** April 05, 2006, 06:50:51 PM »

And with that last thought we'll close out the topic here at GBO also. Please see my comments regarding this on the other thread started by BM at this link:

http://www.graybeardoutdoors.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=89486