I am not a real smart guy sometimes, I guess because I keep putting my foot in my mouth sometimes. Well here I go again. Why would anyone spend $1000 to $1500 for a Winchester or Marlin in calibers .307. .356, or .358? I was looking on gunbrokers at Browning BLR's and they sell for $500 to $750 in all kinds of calibers, .270, .308, 30-06, etc etc. The common thread of the BLR's is they are hunting cartridges with pointed tip bullets that cannot be matched by the .307, .356, .358. Here is an apples to apples comparison of 180gr bullets:
.308 Caliber
MV/ME 100yds 200yds 300yds 400yds
2550/2598 2383/2229 2223/1974 2069/1711 1922/1477
Traj.
-1.5", 2.3", 0", -9.4", -26.9"
.356 Caliber
MV/Me 100yds 200yds 300yds 400yds
2550/2598 2206/1945 1892/1430 1607/1032 1365/744
Traj.
-1.5" 2.9" 0" -12.7" -38.9"
The pointed tip bullet has a BC of .516 (.308) and the Flat nose bullet has a BC of .245 (.356).
It can't be for hunting they are paying this much money for as soon to be obsolete cartridges so it must be for nostalgia or collecting. It also can't be for quality as Browning in my opinion is superior to both the Winchester and the Marlin rifles.
I already own four Marlins and my next levergun will be a BLR in a .308 caliber. I am going to give my grandson and nephew the 30-30 and the 35Remington as a starter gun for their hunting career.
I am not trying to start a flaming war but to me if I was collecting for history it would be for rifles manufactured in the 19th century and western style only.
fknipfer