Author Topic: 308 Win  (Read 968 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrfishnhunt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
308 Win
« on: June 20, 2006, 12:05:34 PM »
Anyone ever load a 125-130 sp in a 308 cartridge? I am thinking of tring it for the small deer here (80-130 lbs.). The 150 kill great but I would like a little less meat loss.My rifle has liked H-Varget for every other bullet, sio maybe these also. My main consern is that my barrel has a 1 in 10" twist, I don't know if they will shoot very well. Thankd for the info.

Offline TNrifleman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 542
  • Gender: Male
308 Win
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2006, 01:19:39 PM »
Using the lighter bullets that you mention would likely increase the meat loss that you see with the 150s. Consider using heavier bullets in the 165 to 180 grain range in your 308. These bullets will be less fragile, a bit slower from the 308 case, and should upset (mushroom) less that the lighter bullets. Another thing to consider is shot placement. A shot behind the shoulder through the lungs will kill quickly and cause minimal damage to eatible meat. This ideal shot placement is not always possible in the real world.

Offline Dippingvat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
308 Win
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2006, 03:11:59 PM »
TR is correct on the meat loss.  You need a larger bullet to get less meat damage.  A smaller bullet will break apart usually or richocet around and cause lots of meat damage.  Shoot at least a 165 Accubond or Partition and will get a quick kill with hardly much damage and you won't recover your bullet.   :grin:   :grin:   :grin:

Offline Chuck White

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 681
308 Win
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2006, 03:12:21 AM »
The comments made so far are correct!
The 130's will cause more damage than the 150's or 165's!

Last year I loaded up some 130's for my wife (I figured they'd have less recoil) to use in her Rem M-7 in 308 and she shot a doe at around 100 yards! The hit was just behind the shoulder, in the middle of the ribs!  The deer dropped immediately and when we got to her and rolled her over, she had a double-fist sized exit hole on the other side!  One can just imagine what damage would have been done on a bad hit!

She'll probably shoot these up on targets or whatever this summer and will be using some 150's this fall!

The 130's do shoot very well in her rifle, but when these are gone, that will be it!
Chuck White
USAF Retired, Life Member, NRA & NAHC
Don't matter what gun you use,
just get good with it!

Offline james

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 798
  • Gender: Male
308 Win
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2006, 03:19:38 AM »
I tried 125 gr. in my Rem 788 -.308 and the groups doubled in size over the 150 gr bullets.  I use 150s or 165s for everything ... including varmints.  One of my most accurate reloads is the Sierra 165 Gameking, which has worked very well in windy conditions on  antelope.   I've shot a lot of deer with the 150 gr Rem coreloks and I doubt if bullets costing twice as much would have killed them any deader.  I shot my last mule deer and antelope with factory 150 Winchester Supreme Silvertips.  The deer dropped in his tracks with a shoulder shot and the antelope took about two steps after being hit in the lungs.  Good huntin to you.
james

Offline sgtt

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 556
308 Win
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2006, 08:39:39 PM »
They WILL work.
"Freedom, for some, is problematic.  It does not grant emancipation from responsibility."

Offline longwinters

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3070
308 Win
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2006, 03:53:44 PM »
If I was going to try a 125-130 gn bullet I would go with the TSX.  I think they are way too expensive (priced them at 37.88 earlier this week) but if I really wanted to shoot that light of a bullet for deer  out of a 308 it would be my choice.  But I always shoot 150-165 gn bullets so it has not been a problem to me. :lol:

Long
Life is short......eternity is long.

Offline jd45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 537
308 Win
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2006, 02:58:53 AM »
For a 1 in 10 barrel you wanna go heavier, not lighter. I'd try Hornady's 180gr round nose soft point, with minimum charges of Varget. I'm gonna try them in my 1 in 12 barrel.....they should be the high end limit for this twist, though  the 150's, & 165's shoot great. JD45

Offline Brithunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
308 Win
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2006, 07:33:37 AM »
Hmm whilst I agree in theory that heavier is less frangible the fact is not alway the case :roll:  my first Roe Doe I shot with my Brno Mod 601 .308 and as the Roe is a light animal and I didn't want to lose a lot of meat I brought and developed a load  ( a mid range load as Roe are not tough nor armour plated  :wink: ) using Rel 15 powder WLR primers and Sierra 180 Grn Pro Hunter bullets. The shot came at about 90 yards and the Doe rolled over and expired. Great that is until we got up to he where we found a great chunk of her insides hanging out of a great hole in her side. That so stable 180 grain Sierra had blown up on her ribs taking out 3 of them on exit right around the diaphram.

We found parts of the jacket and core inside her  :shock:  and this Doe weighted all of 35lbs. I switched to Speer and hornady bullets right after that and only ever use Sierra if ............................... if I can get nothing else  :(  I settled on using the Speer 165 grain Flat based bullet for most of my .308 use.

However in the 30-30 which is a bolt action I use either 125 or 130 grain spitzers loaded to around 2800fps and find they work very well indeed. :grin:

Offline jd45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 537
308 Win
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2006, 10:14:11 AM »
Brithunter, can you verify the weight of that doe you shot.........if I read your post correctly, you said 35 lbs, that right? If so, that would be a fawn here in the states, which, if I'm not mistaken, are not legally shootable. Do you have midget deer where you are? Please clarify, JD45

Offline ButlerFord45

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1992
  • Gender: Male
308 Win
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2006, 11:20:33 AM »
The Roe Deer is a relatively small deer, with a body length of 95-135 cm, a shoulder height of 65-75 cm, and a weight of 15-30 kg.
Butler Ford
He who does not punish evil, commands it to be done.-Leonardo da Vinci
An armed society is a polite society-Robert A. Heinlein
Only the dead have seen the end of war- Plato
Lord, make my words as sweet as honey
tomorrow I may have to eat them- A lady's sweatshirt

Offline jd45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 537
308 Win
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2006, 02:24:30 PM »
38" to 54" long; 26" to 30" high; & 33 to 66 lbs, that IS a small deer, Butler!, JD45

Offline ButlerFord45

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1992
  • Gender: Male
308 Win
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2006, 02:13:50 AM »
Sorry, that was a "Copy-Paste" from an on line web encylopedia, I was short on time but wanted you to have the information.  Thanks for converting to real measurements for me.   :D
Butler Ford
He who does not punish evil, commands it to be done.-Leonardo da Vinci
An armed society is a polite society-Robert A. Heinlein
Only the dead have seen the end of war- Plato
Lord, make my words as sweet as honey
tomorrow I may have to eat them- A lady's sweatshirt

Offline jd45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 537
308 Win
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2006, 02:06:05 PM »
My pleasure, Sir!..............as small as they are, they must be mighty tender & tasty! JD45

Offline Coyote Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2534
308 Win
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2006, 05:58:34 PM »
rob162 -

I'm ging to agree with others here and suggest a heavier bullet at slower speeds will do less meat damage.

Find one that is accurate, them place it behind the font legs, problem solved.
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

Offline Selmer

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
308 Win
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2006, 02:58:51 AM »
Or you can use the 125 gr. Nosler Ballistic tip at low velocities, think .30-30ish.  Low recoil, low meat damage, it's what my father started us on for a lighter recoiling rifle that still packed a wallop when we wanted to load it up.
selmer
PS  If you want the load, let me know. :)
"Next to the glory of God, music deserves the highest praise"-Martin Luther
Any homo sapien with the proper chromosomes can be labeled a father, but it takes a man to be called "Daddy"-unknown

Offline Don Fischer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1526
308 Win
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2006, 09:12:19 AM »
I've used the 308 a great deal and favor the 165gr bullets, either Hornady or Speer.


Quote
This ideal shot placement is not always possible in the real world.



Ideal shot placement IS always possible in the real world. What's not always possible is convincing someone NOT to shoot! Where the 130gr bullet may be a problem might be on a shot going thru a shoulder. Someone mentioned a 180gr Sierra blowing up on a deer rib. For a 30 cal rifle cartridge for deer, I would think it wouldn't even be concidered. Why shoot a 30 130gr bullet when you could shoot a better 130gr 27 cal bullet?

Then too, if someone is determined to use lightly constructed bullets, they will work. Then shot placement becomes critical!
:wink: Even a blind squrrel find's an acorn sometime's![/quote]

Offline Travis Shuck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 68
  • Gender: Male
308 Win
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2006, 01:11:45 PM »
Quote from: jd45
Brithunter, can you verify the weight of that doe you shot.........if I read your post correctly, you said 35 lbs, that right? If so, that would be a fawn here in the states, which, if I'm not mistaken, are not legally shootable. Do you have midget deer where you are? Please clarify, JD45


Not to start any arguements, but where I am from in Wyoming the regulations will usually state either antlered deer only  , or any deer.  And when it says any deer it means any deer. :grin: [/u]
"seeing then that all these things shall be disolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness." 2Peter 3:11

Offline The Sodbuster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
308 Win
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2006, 04:10:12 PM »
jd45 commented:
Quote
if I read your post correctly, you said 35 lbs, that right? If so, that would be a fawn here in the states, which, if I'm not mistaken, are not legally shootable.

I'm with Travis Shuck on this one.  Don't know about the reg's where your're from, but I've used my Missouri any-deer tag on fawns more than once.  Very tender.

Offline Selmer

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
Re: 308 Win
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2006, 06:48:12 AM »
Settle down guys, he said a ROE deer, which is a small deer in EUROPE and ASIA.  This is not a whitetail nor a fawn.
selmer
"Next to the glory of God, music deserves the highest praise"-Martin Luther
Any homo sapien with the proper chromosomes can be labeled a father, but it takes a man to be called "Daddy"-unknown