I'd question the use of that 235 grain pointed bullet in a .375 Winchester. No doubt that bullet was designed for the .375 H&H magnum at considerably higher velocity than will be possible from a .375 Winchester and I'd especially doubt it would expand properly at 200 yards. Forget the numbers on paper, I'd feel much better using the 220 grain Hornady which was designed for the cartridge you are using.
I have to chuckle at the theory that it takes "X" number of foot pounds energy to make a clean kill on a certain species. That implies that a certain bullet will knock an animal on its' butt at exactly 167 yards but will totally fail at 168 yards. And it implies that all animals of a given species are the same every time. As if a critter on the alert, knowing its' being hunted is the same as one caught snoozing. And it implies that a shot on the edge of the kill zone is the same as one in the heart, as if one could even draw a fine line to say this IS the kill zone. The animal may be facing straight on, straight away, quartering left away, right forward, above the hunter or below--etc. Those numbers are just a lot of foolishness-- if you put the bullet in the right place, assuming it has the penetration to reach the right place with the shot you are presented, you'll have meat, numbers be as they will.
My best buddy hunts with a T/C Encore in .375 Winchester. He loads the 220 Hornady at a bit over 2300 fps and has taken several elk with it. You'd be hard pressed to convince him it is not a 200 yard elk rifle. Personally, I fell for the Elmer Keith bull and thought the .338 Win Mag was THE elk rifle. Now that I've gotten old and scrawny, I just don't like getting kicked that hard and I now prefer my 6.5X55 or my 30/30 and find they work just as well.