data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c2fc/5c2fc18dedfde104585dc24eeee2c25c27886a0e" alt="Shocked :o"
I have received some inquiries lately about comparing the merits of the Ruger Mini series of rifles versus the AR-15 series with various upper receivers (with some interesting calibers) for hunting. I would like to offer my opinion on these rifles, disregarding the issue of the caliber to be used, merely commenting on what I feel are the merits of the rifle design for hunting.
AR-15 Ruger Mini series
Caliber offerings Very numerous with the different upper receivers 5.56x45 and 7.62x39
Dependability Sensitive to dirt and lack of lubrication Not dirt or lubrication sensitive
Sights Standard type leave scope high and negatively New /5 series have excellent peeps as integral
impact rifle for snap shots (high point of balance) IMO part of receiver and offer use of Ruger rings
Ease of maintenance Not bad, breaks down fairly simply Very easy to field strip. Fewer components than AR.
For the above reasons I prefer the Ruger as a hunting rifle. To me, it has better balance, especially with a scope installed. It also is easier to check the bolt for lock-up and to inspect the chamber for a round. Additionally, it is easier to insure that the bolt is seated. As the sights tend to be lower over the axis of the bore it provides a better chance of not missing at close ranges on a snap shot. That said, there are some very interesting calibers offered in the AR derivatives, and this alone may suggest their use for hunting.