Growing up, my father was always using aluminum arrows...so, I did the same. They've seemed to work very well over the years, and have seemed plenty durable for target/hunting situations.
He has always been the "more weight is better" kind of shooter (rifles and bows). "A heavier object carries more energy down range" and "heavier objects hit hard, penetrate deeper" are phrases I've heard ALL TOO MANY TIMES. Then of course, he always told me carbon arrows were bad for your health. (lung/stomach damage from splinters, ruining meat with carbon splinters, disintegrating on the string, etc)
BUT, nearly everyone at my range is shooting carbon arrows...and they swear by them... But I find more broken carbon arrows throughout the course than I do aluminum ones. The worst thing I see, is they are all broken in different manners...Some cracked, some cleanly broken in half, some splintered, and some completely disintegrated.
The benefits of a lighter, flatter shooting arrows are obvious...but will a lighter arrow and a faster speed REALLY reduce penetration all that much? FWIW, I limit my shooting distance to ~40 yards.
I want the facts of carbon vs. aluminum, and I want recommendations. I'm shooting an inexpensive PSE Nova, whiskerbiscuit rest, maxed at 60#'s and a 29" draw. Don't laugh--it shoots well for me, and has cleanly taken 6 deer!
My last 1/2doz. arrows were Easton Fall Stalker's in 2219 size using 125gr tips....that's 13.8 grains per inch for a 400 grain shaft + 125 tip. Hunting reg's require 6 grains of weight per # of draw weight, so I MUST use at least a 360gr arrow (weight includes tip).
Also, I'm not looking to spend an arm and a leg for 1/2doz. arrows. My fall stalkers were <$3 each.
Thanks in advance!