Author Topic: New smaller X frame?  (Read 728 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline webrehm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
New smaller X frame?
« on: August 31, 2006, 07:24:07 AM »
Do you guys think there is any possibility that SW will come out with a smaller X frame that can shoot 44,454,475 and 500 Special?

tks

Dennis

Offline waynemorgan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2006, 10:34:56 AM »
not going to happen ! it would not be an X frame if they did

Offline webrehm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2006, 12:12:49 PM »
It would be a new frame for 44,454,475 and 500 special, but based upon the X frame.

Dennis

Offline Dusty Miller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
  • Gender: Male
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2006, 02:18:40 PM »
Maybe they'd call it the "Y" frame or even the "WHY" frame??
When seconds mean life or death, the police are only minutes away!

Offline webrehm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2006, 04:25:43 PM »
Why?  Because a lot of people are buying 44's that they can use Garrett or Buffalo Bore heavy loads in,  A SW 44 won't take the pressure.
Also a lot of people are buying 454's, in other brands. 
Dennis

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27021
  • Gender: Male
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2006, 05:09:46 PM »
Why?  Because a lot of people are buying 44's that they can use Garrett or Buffalo Bore heavy loads in,  A SW 44 won't take the pressure.
Also a lot of people are buying 454's, in other brands. 
Dennis


WRONG-O The S&W is fine using both Garrett and Buffalo Bore ammo. I use it in mine all the time. The rumors of the weakness of the S&W 29/629 are just that, wild rumors.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2006, 05:28:21 PM »
Why?  Because a lot of people are buying 44's that they can use Garrett or Buffalo Bore heavy loads in,  A SW 44 won't take the pressure.
Also a lot of people are buying 454's, in other brands. 
Dennis


WRONG-O The S&W is fine using both Garrett and Buffalo Bore ammo. I use it in mine all the time. The rumors of the weakness of the S&W 29/629 are just that, wild rumors.

Thanks GB, I have been saying that for a while now.  ;D
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline webrehm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2006, 08:35:10 AM »
And then there are those who want a 454 with a spec pressure limit of 65000psi.  I think the spec pressure limit for a 475 is at least 50000 psi.
Both buffalobore and garret do NOT recommend a SW be used with their +p+ 44 magnum ammunition.

Here is the quote from the buffalobore website for the +P+ 44 magnum load that they sell
"This new load is designed for only certain revolvers that have the cylinder length to handle it. They are as follows. Ruger Red Hawk, Taurus Raging Bull and Dan Wesson Revolvers."

Here is the quote from GarretCartridges
"THIS 44 MAGNUM  AMMO IS RECOMMENDED FOR USE IN RUGER AND DAN WESSON DOUBLE-ACTION REVOLVERS, AS WELL AS THE TAURUS RAGING BULL. IT IS ALSO RECOMMENDED FOR THE GARY REEDER 5-SHOT ULTIMATE 44 MAGNUM, AND THE JOHN GALLAGHER CUSTOM LONG-CYLINDER RUGER SINGLE-ACTIONS. THIS  AMMO SHOULD BE FIRED ONLY IN THOSE RECOMMENDED REVOLVERS! THIS AMMO IS BOTH TOO LONG AND GENERATES TOO MUCH CHAMBER PRESSURE FOR SAFE USE IN S&W AND RUGER SUPER BLACKHAWK REVOLVERS. IT IS ALSO TOO LONG FOR USE IN THE FREEDOM ARMS REVOLVER."

I think it very likely that SW would sell many guns that were set up to shoot the +p+ 44 magnums, 454, 475 and 500 specials.  Can a 629 handle the OAL and pressure of a 454?


Dennis




Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27021
  • Gender: Male
Re: New smaller X frame?
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2006, 01:59:16 PM »
I still don't know why folks think the S&W cylinder is too short for them. It isn't. I have used them with complete satisfaction in the S&W and have told the same to Tim at BB. They are not too long to fit it.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!