Author Topic: H4831 vs h4831sc ???  (Read 296 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kenscot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
H4831 vs h4831sc ???
« on: October 01, 2006, 02:56:24 AM »
For years I have used h4831 in my 270's. It has always given me superb accuracy. when they firs introduced the short cut version I was afraid thet were going to do away with the regular. I would like to here from those who have made the switch what kind of differant performance they have found if any.

Offline beemanbeme

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2587
Re: H4831 vs h4831sc ???
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2006, 04:54:40 AM »
according to Hodgdon, they will give you exactly the same results. The short cut doesn't take up as much room so compressed loads are kinda passe'.  I don't use a lot of it but I've switched and in the applications where I do use it, I can't tell any difference.  I haven't Chronied any loads with the SC against what I was getting from the standard powder but a like charge of SC shoots to the same POI as the charge using standard.

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: H4831 vs h4831sc ???
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2006, 07:21:55 AM »
I never switched, I just started using the SC. It gives me the accuracy I want (1.25" at 100 yards with this particular gun and bullet), and it meters very well, much nicer than powders with longer sticks.
Safety first